Laramore G E, Krall J M, Griffin T W, Duncan W, Richter M P, Saroja K R, Maor M H, Davis L W
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Sep 30;27(2):235-40. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90233-l.
To compare the efficacy of fast neutron radiotherapy versus conventional photon and/or electron radiotherapy for unresectable, malignant salivary gland tumors a randomized clinical trial comparing was sponsored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group in the United States and the Medical Research Council in Great Britain.
Eligibility criteria included either inoperable primary or recurrent major or minor salivary gland tumors. Patients were stratified by surgical status (primary vs. recurrent), tumor size (less than or greater than 5 cm), and histology (squamous or malignant mixed versus other). After a total of 32 patients were entered onto this study, it appeared that the group receiving fast neutron radiotherapy had a significantly improved local/regional control rate and also a borderline improvement in survival and the study was stopped earlier than planned for ethical reasons. Twenty-five patients were study-eligible and analyzable.
Ten-year follow-up data for this study is presented. On an actuarial basis, there continues to be a statistically-significant p = 0.009) but there is no improvement in overall survival (15% vs. 25%, p = n.s.). Patterns of failure are analyzed and it is shown that distant metastases account for the majority of failures on the neutron arm and local/regional failures account for the majority of failures on the photon arm. Long-term, treatment-related morbidity is analyzed and while the incidence of morbidity graded "severe" was greater on the neutron arm, there was no significant difference in "life-threatening" complications. This work is placed in the context of other series of malignant salivary gland tumors treated with definitive radiotherapy.
Fast neutron radiotherapy appears to be the treatment-of-choice for patients with inoperable primary of recurrent malignant salivary gland tumors.
比较快中子放射治疗与传统光子和/或电子放射治疗对不可切除恶性唾液腺肿瘤的疗效。一项比较性随机临床试验由美国放射肿瘤学组和英国医学研究理事会发起。
入选标准包括无法手术的原发性或复发性大或小唾液腺肿瘤。患者按手术状态(原发性与复发性)、肿瘤大小(小于或大于5厘米)和组织学(鳞状或恶性混合与其他)进行分层。在共有32名患者进入本研究后,接受快中子放射治疗的组似乎局部/区域控制率显著提高,生存率也有临界改善,出于伦理原因,研究比计划提前停止。25名患者符合研究条件并可进行分析。
给出了本研究的十年随访数据。根据精算,局部/区域控制率仍有统计学显著性差异(p = 0.009),但总生存率无改善(15%对25%,p = 无显著性差异)。分析了失败模式,结果显示中子治疗组远处转移是主要的失败原因,光子治疗组局部/区域失败是主要的失败原因。分析了长期的治疗相关发病率,虽然中子治疗组“严重”发病率更高,但“危及生命”并发症无显著差异。这项工作是在其他接受根治性放射治疗的恶性唾液腺肿瘤系列研究的背景下进行的。
快中子放射治疗似乎是不可切除原发性或复发性恶性唾液腺肿瘤患者的首选治疗方法。