Gorelick M H, Shaw K N, Baker M D
Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA 19010.
Pediatrics. 1993 Nov;92(5):699-702.
To assess the effect of moderately decreased ambient temperature on capillary refill (CR) time in healthy children, and to measure the reliability of CR measurements between observers.
Prospective interventional study with cross-over design.
Urban pediatric emergency department.
32 well-hydrated children aged 1 month to 12 years brought to the emergency department for care of minor illness or injury.
Participants were assigned in random order to a 15-minute waiting period in each of two rooms, with and without air-conditioning (cool and warm rooms, respectively). At the end of each waiting period, fingertip CR was measured with a stopwatch, three times by each of one or more three trained observers.
Mean CR time was 0.85 +/- 0.45 seconds in the warm room (mean ambient temperature (25.7 degrees C) vs 2.39 +/- 0.76 seconds in the cool room (mean temperature 19.4 degrees C). The mean overall difference in CR time between the two environments was 1.53 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31, 1.75; P < .001); the difference was significant regardless of age or sequence of exposure. 100% of patients were considered to have normal CR (less than 2 seconds) in the warm room, whereas only 31% were considered normal in the cool room. In the 16 patients with CR measured by three observers, interobserver reliability was fair, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.85), and kappa of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.73).
Decreases in ambient temperature within a range found in typical office/emergency department settings may cause significant prolongation of CR time in children with normal circulatory status. There is marked interobserver variability in the measurement of CR even when performed by experienced observers. These findings suggest limitations to the use of CR in the assessment of ill or injured children.
评估环境温度适度降低对健康儿童毛细血管再充盈(CR)时间的影响,并测量观察者之间CR测量的可靠性。
采用交叉设计的前瞻性干预研究。
城市儿科急诊科。
32名水分充足的1个月至12岁儿童,因小病或轻伤被带到急诊科就诊。
参与者被随机分配到两个房间中的每个房间等待15分钟,一个房间有空调(凉爽房间),另一个房间没有空调(温暖房间)。在每个等待期结束时,由一名或多名经过培训的三名观察者分别用秒表测量指尖CR三次。
温暖房间的平均CR时间为0.85±0.45秒(平均环境温度25.7摄氏度),而凉爽房间为2.39±0.76秒(平均温度19.4摄氏度)。两种环境下CR时间的总体平均差异为1.53秒(95%置信区间[CI]:1.31,1.75;P<.001);无论年龄或暴露顺序如何,差异均显著。在温暖房间中,100%的患者被认为CR正常(小于2秒),而在凉爽房间中只有31%被认为正常。在由三名观察者测量CR的16名患者中,观察者间可靠性一般,组内相关系数为0.70(95%CI:0.56,0.85),kappa值为0.54(95%CI:0.33,0.73)。
在典型办公室/急诊科环境中发现的环境温度范围内的降低可能会导致循环状态正常的儿童CR时间显著延长。即使由经验丰富的观察者进行测量,CR测量中观察者间的变异性也很明显。这些发现表明在评估患病或受伤儿童时使用CR存在局限性。