Suppr超能文献

不同方法筛查献血者乙肝表面抗原的比较。

A comparison of different methods of screening blood donations for HBsAg.

作者信息

Barbara J A, Howell D R, Cleghorn T E, Cameron C H, Briggs M, Dane D S

出版信息

Vox Sang. 1977;32(1):4-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1977.tb00597.x.

Abstract

In a retrospective comparison between countermigration immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP) and reverse passive haemagglutination (RPHA) for screening 260,500 blood donations, the latter's 10-fold increase in sensitivity resulted in 36% more HBsAg detections. In a prospective comparison between RPHA and radioimmunoassay (RIA) the latter's 40-fold increase in sensitivity over RPHA resulted in 11% more detections than RPHA in 27,094 new donors. One in 500 new donors was HBsAg-positive by RPHA, compared with 1 in 11,000 established donors who had donated and been tested previously. Acute hepatitis B infections, though uncommon, accounted for a greater proportion of the HBsAg-positive found in "established" rather than new donors. Reported post-transfusion hepatitis cases have declined following the introduction of screening tests in 1971. The feasibility of RIA testing at a transfusion centre supplied simply with the two basic RIA reagents has been demonstrated.

摘要

在对260500份献血样本进行筛查时,采用对流免疫电泳(CIEP)和反向被动血凝试验(RPHA)进行回顾性比较,结果显示后者的灵敏度提高了10倍,使得乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)检测阳性率增加了36%。在对RPHA和放射免疫分析(RIA)进行前瞻性比较时,结果显示RIA的灵敏度比RPHA提高了40倍,在27094名新献血者中,其检测阳性率比RPHA高出11%。RPHA检测出每500名新献血者中有1名HBsAg呈阳性,而在之前已献血并接受过检测的固定献血者中,这一比例为1/11000。急性乙型肝炎感染虽不常见,但在“固定”献血者中,HBsAg阳性者所占比例高于新献血者。自1971年引入筛查检测后,报告的输血后肝炎病例有所减少。在仅配备两种基本RIA试剂的输血中心进行RIA检测的可行性已得到证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验