McKinlay J B
New England Research Institute, Watertown, MA 02172.
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jan;36(2):109-17. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-f.
The focus of health promotion is moving from the level of individuals to organizations, communities and broader social policy. Traditional quantitative methods (e.g. social surveys and experimental designs) which are variously appropriate at the level of individual behavior change require adaptation and refinement when sociopolitical change becomes the mechanism for health promotion. Because of their training and experience health services researchers and health educators (especially psychologists) are understandably resistant to necessary methodologic changes. Well designed and carefully conducted qualitative studies (e.g. ethnographic interviewing, participant observation, case studies and focus group activities) are required to complement quantitative approaches, and can fill gaps where quantitative techniques are suboptimal or even inappropriate: hard qualitative techniques can support soft quantitative methods. Their utility in process evaluation is now beyond dispute. Recent work at the New England Research Institute (NERI) is used to illustrate the role of qualitative research in the evaluation of health promotion through planned sociopolitical change.
健康促进的重点正从个人层面转向组织、社区及更广泛的社会政策。传统的定量方法(如社会调查和实验设计)在个人行为改变层面有不同程度的适用性,但当社会政治变革成为健康促进的机制时,就需要进行调整和完善。鉴于其培训经历和经验,健康服务研究人员和健康教育工作者(尤其是心理学家)对必要的方法变革产生抵触情绪是可以理解的。需要精心设计和认真开展定性研究(如人种学访谈、参与观察、案例研究和焦点小组活动)来补充定量方法,并且可以填补定量技术欠佳甚至不适用的空白:硬定性技术可以支持软定量方法。其在过程评估中的效用现已无可争议。新英格兰研究所(NERI)近期的工作被用来说明定性研究在通过有计划的社会政治变革进行健康促进评估中的作用。