• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于字母视力表视力测量的统计学可靠性

On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.

作者信息

Arditi A, Cagenello R

机构信息

Vision Research Laboratory, Lighthouse Inc., New York, New York 10017.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;34(1):120-9.

PMID:8425819
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine boundary values of test-retest reliability and sensitivity to acuity change that are unlikely to be exceeded in any clinical situation, for a popular visual acuity chart (Lighthouse/ETDRS) with three scoring methods; to discuss general methodological issues associated with statistical accuracy of optotype chart testing; and to link measures of test reliability to measures of sensitivity to change.

METHODS

Five highly practiced subjects were tested using a computer-controlled acuity testing system in a procedure designed to reduce measurement error. Subjects read the computerized chart 156 times, yielding a sample of 78 test-retest comparisons.

RESULTS

Under conditions likely to minimize variability, visual acuity may, with 95% confidence, be ascertained only within +/- 0.1 log units, using this chart with the recommended letter-by-letter scoring. Detecting a significant change in visual acuity requires about +/- 0.14 log units for the same degree of confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

These measurements may be viewed as approaching the upper limit of reliability of this letter chart. Reliability probably is considerably less in typical usage.

摘要

目的

对于一种具有三种评分方法的常用视力表(灯塔/早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究组 [ETDRS] 视力表),确定在任何临床情况下都不太可能超过的重测信度和视力变化敏感度的界值;讨论与视标视力表测试统计准确性相关的一般方法学问题;并将测试信度的测量与变化敏感度的测量联系起来。

方法

使用计算机控制的视力测试系统对五名经验丰富的受试者进行测试,该程序旨在减少测量误差。受试者阅读计算机化视力表156次,得到78对重测比较样本。

结果

在可能使变异性最小化的条件下,使用该视力表并采用推荐的逐字母评分法,视力在95%置信度下只能确定在±0.1对数单位范围内。对于相同的置信度,检测视力的显著变化需要约±0.14对数单位。

结论

这些测量结果可被视为接近该字母视力表信度的上限。在典型使用中,信度可能要低得多。

相似文献

1
On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements.关于字母视力表视力测量的统计学可靠性
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jan;34(1):120-9.
2
Visual acuity scored by the letter-by-letter or probit methods has lower retest variability than the line assignment method.逐字母或概率单位法评分的视力,其重测变异性低于行分配法。
Eye (Lond). 1997;11 ( Pt 3):411-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1997.87.
3
Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.提高幼儿视力测量的可靠性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 May;20(3):173-84.
4
Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.改进ETDRS视力:一种计算机阈值测定设备的设计与结果
Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700496.
5
Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.电脑化对数最小分辨角视力测量系统(COMPlog)的验证:与成人及弱视儿童的ETDRS和电子ETDRS测试算法的比较
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;92(2):241-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.121715. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
6
The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.泰国对数视力表。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85(6):673-81.
7
Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.计算机化的重复和平均可改善 ETDRS 视力测量的测试-再测试变异性:对敏感性和特异性的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 9;52(13):9397-402. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7797.
8
Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.字母分离对电脑视力测量的影响:与金标准糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)图表的比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):200-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00700.x.
9
Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.用于测量年龄相关性黄斑变性最佳视力的计算机化测试。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4838-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1240.
10
Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.“手动”和“数指”视力可通过 Freiburg 视力测试进行量化。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):1236-40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0981.

引用本文的文献

1
Choroidal microvascular dropout and its relationship to progression in primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.脉络膜微血管缺失及其与原发性开角型青光眼和剥脱性青光眼进展的关系。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03977-1.
2
Assessment of Emergency Department Intraocular Pressure and Visual Acuity Assessment as a Screening Exam.急诊科眼压及视力评估作为一种筛查检查
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 25;19:683-690. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S511327. eCollection 2025.
3
Real world data on digital remote refraction in a healthy population of 14,680 eyes.
关于14680只眼睛的健康人群数字远程验光的真实世界数据。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 6;8(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01453-0.
4
Landolt C-Tests With "Fixed" Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults.Landolt C 测验采用“固定”弧分分离度检测弱视,但低估了中重度弱视儿童和成人的拥挤度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Aug 1;65(10):33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.10.33.
5
A new, adaptive, self-administered, and generalizable method used to measure visual acuity.一种新的、自适应的、自我管理的和可推广的测量视力的方法。
Optom Vis Sci. 2024 Jul 1;101(7):451-463. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002160.
6
Development and Evaluation of a New Self-Administered Near Visual Acuity Chart: Accuracy and Feasibility of Usage.一种新型自测量近视力表的研制与评估:使用的准确性和可行性
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072064.
7
The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.《弗赖堡幼儿敏锐度测试:测试性、重测变异性,以及与 LEA 符号的比较》
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):14. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.14.
8
Validation of a computerized version of the MNREAD chart for children.验证 MNREAD 图表的计算机化版本在儿童中的应用。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 11;44(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03056-2.
9
Test-retest repeatability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test: towards the validation of a new clinical endpoint.定量对比敏感度功能测试的重测重复性和一致性:新临床终点的验证。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar;262(3):813-822. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06291-y. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
10
Efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy monitored by fluorescein angiography in patients with retinal artery occlusion.荧光素眼底血管造影监测高压氧治疗视网膜动脉阻塞的疗效及安全性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 20;108(7):956-962. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323972.