Lovitt R
Department of Psychiatry, Southwestern Medical Center, University of Texas, Dallas 75235-9070.
J Pers Assess. 1993 Feb;60(1):141-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_11.
Effective assessment practice is dependent on synthesizing data from multiple sources. Our standard literature and experimental data base does not supply all the information practitioners need to provide assessment services. Practitioners must engage in a variety of novel operations to generate an acceptable assessment product. The role of the practitioner may be conceptualized as an independent contributor to the knowledge base underlying assessment. In this article, I articulate a series of stages serving as a guideline in integrating discrepant data from a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and Rorschach for a disturbed patient. The integrated data provides a more precise understanding of the patient than either data set by itself.
有效的评估实践依赖于综合来自多个来源的数据。我们的标准文献和实验数据库并未提供从业者提供评估服务所需的所有信息。从业者必须进行各种新颖的操作来生成可接受的评估结果。从业者的角色可以被概念化为评估基础知识库的独立贡献者。在本文中,我阐述了一系列阶段,作为整合来自明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)和罗夏墨迹测验针对一名精神障碍患者的不一致数据的指导方针。整合后的数据比单独的任何一个数据集都能更精确地理解患者。