• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国国家航空航天局(NASA)宇航员候选人的结构化精神病学访谈结果。

Results of a structured psychiatric interview to evaluate NASA astronaut candidates.

作者信息

Santy P A, Endicott J, Jones D R, Rose R M, Patterson J, Holland A W, Faulk D M, Marsh R

机构信息

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

出版信息

Mil Med. 1993 Jan;158(1):5-9.

PMID:8437740
Abstract

One hundred six astronaut applicants who had passed initial screening were evaluated for Axis I and Axis II DSM-III-R diagnoses using a structured psychiatric interview. Nine of 106 candidates (8.5%) met diagnostic criteria for six Axis I (including V-code), or Axis II disorders. The use of the NASA structured interview was effective in identifying past and present psychopathology in a group of highly motivated and healthy astronaut applicants. This was the first time that a structured interview had been used in such a setting for this purpose. The methodology described is applicable to any situation where the presence or history of psychopathology requires evaluation for job selection (e.g. pilot selection).

摘要

106名通过初步筛选的宇航员申请者接受了结构化精神科访谈,以评估其《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中轴I和轴II的诊断情况。106名候选人中有9名(8.5%)符合6种轴I(包括V编码)或轴II障碍的诊断标准。美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的结构化访谈在识别一群积极性高且健康的宇航员申请者过去和现在的精神病理学方面很有效。这是首次在这种情况下为此目的使用结构化访谈。所描述的方法适用于任何需要评估精神病理学存在情况或病史以进行工作选拔的情况(例如飞行员选拔)。

相似文献

1
Results of a structured psychiatric interview to evaluate NASA astronaut candidates.评估美国国家航空航天局(NASA)宇航员候选人的结构化精神病学访谈结果。
Mil Med. 1993 Jan;158(1):5-9.
2
Psychiatric diagnoses in a group of astronaut applicants.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1991 Oct;62(10):969-73.
3
Astronaut psychiatric selection procedures: a Japanese experience.宇航员的精神科选拔程序:日本的经验
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):916-9.
4
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
5
Psychological evaluation of Japanese astronaut applicants.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Oct;65(10 Pt 1):920-4.
6
The interrater reliability of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格结构化访谈的评分者间信度。
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Sep-Oct;47(5):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 May 2.
7
Analysis of age as a factor in NASA astronaut selection and career landmarks.美国国家航空航天局(NASA)宇航员选拔及职业里程碑中年龄因素分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181381. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparing the Personality Disorder Interview for DSM-IV (PDI-IV) and SCID-II borderline personality disorder scales: an item-response theory analysis.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍访谈量表(PDI-IV)与《精神障碍诊断统计手册》第二版边缘型人格障碍量表:一项项目反应理论分析
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.946606. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
9
Psychometric Personality Differences Between Candidates in Astronaut Selection.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016;87(11):933-939. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4548.2016.
10
Development and preliminary validation of a semi-structured interview for the screening of law enforcement candidates.
Behav Sci Law. 1999;17(4):467-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<467::aid-bsl355>3.0.co;2-t.