Massaro D W, Cohen M M
Program in Experimental Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1993 Mar;122(1):115-24. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.122.1.115.
Cutting, Bruno, Brady, and Moore (1992) criticized the paradigm for inquiry and the fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP) presented in Massaro (1988a). In this reply to their remarks, it is shown that (a) the properties of the paradigm are ideal for inquiry; (b) models are best tested against the results of individual subjects and not average group data; (c) model fitting and analysis of variance do not give contradictory results; (d) the FLMP can be proven false and does not have a superpower to predict a plethora of functions or to absorb random variability; and (e) various extraneous characteristics of a model, such as equation length, cannot account for the success of the FLMP. On the other hand, the empirical findings of Cutting et al. give important new properties of pattern recognition. Finally, Cutting's theory of directed perception is compared with the FLMP.
卡廷、布鲁诺、布雷迪和穆尔（1992年）批评了马萨罗（1988年a）提出的探究范式和感知模糊逻辑模型（FLMP）。在对他们言论的回应中，表明了：（a）该范式的特性非常适合探究；（b）模型最好根据个体受试者的结果而非平均组数据进行检验；（c）模型拟合和方差分析不会得出相互矛盾的结果；（d）FLMP可以被证明是错误的，并且没有预测大量功能或吸收随机变异性的超能力；（e）模型的各种无关特征，如方程长度，不能解释FLMP的成功。另一方面，卡廷等人的实证研究结果给出了模式识别的重要新特性。最后，将卡廷的定向感知理论与FLMP进行了比较。
