Suppr超能文献

急诊科急性心肌梗死漏诊情况:一项多中心研究结果

Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study.

作者信息

McCarthy B D, Beshansky J R, D'Agostino R B, Selker H P

机构信息

Center for Cardiovascular Health Services Research, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):579-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81945-6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of missed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department and the factors related to missed diagnoses.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational and case-control study.

SETTING

Data were analyzed from a multicenter study of coronary care unit admitting practices that included patients who presented to the ED with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia (N = 5,773). Patients with missed AMI (cases) were compared with control patients admitted with AMI and to a second control group of patients discharged without AMI.

RESULTS

Of 1,050 patients with AMI, 20 (1.9%; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.9%) were not admitted. Patients with missed AMI were significantly less likely to have ECG changes and a history of AMI or nitroglycerin use than patients admitted with AMI. However, they were significantly more likely to have ECG changes than patients discharged without AMI. Five patients with missed AMI (25%) had ST-segment elevation, and seven (35%) were discharged with a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease by the physician in the ED. Death or potentially lethal complications occurred in 25% of missed AMI patients.

CONCLUSION

The rate of missed AMI in the ED was only 1.9%. However, 25% of these might have been prevented had ST-elevation not been missed, and another 25% might have been prevented had patients who were recognized to have ischemic heart disease by the physician in the ED been admitted.

摘要

研究目的

确定急诊科急性心肌梗死(AMI)漏诊率及与漏诊相关的因素。

研究设计

观察性和病例对照研究。

研究背景

对一项多中心冠心病监护病房收治情况研究的数据进行分析,该研究纳入了因胸痛或其他提示急性心肌缺血症状就诊于急诊科的患者(N = 5773)。将漏诊AMI的患者(病例组)与确诊AMI入院的对照患者以及未诊断为AMI出院的第二对照组患者进行比较。

结果

在1050例AMI患者中,20例(1.9%;95%置信区间,1.2 - 2.9%)未被收治。与确诊AMI入院的患者相比,漏诊AMI的患者出现心电图改变以及有AMI或使用硝酸甘油病史的可能性显著更低。然而,与未诊断为AMI出院的患者相比,他们出现心电图改变的可能性显著更高。5例漏诊AMI患者(25%)出现ST段抬高,7例(35%)在急诊科被医生诊断为缺血性心脏病后出院。25%的漏诊AMI患者发生死亡或潜在致命并发症。

结论

急诊科AMI漏诊率仅为1.9%。然而,如果未漏诊ST段抬高,其中25%的漏诊可能得以避免;如果急诊科医生已识别为缺血性心脏病的患者入院,另外25%的漏诊可能得以避免。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验