Maran A, Lomas J, Archibald H, Macdonald I A, Gale E A, Amiel S A
Unit for Metabolic Medicine, United Medical and Dental School, Guy's Hospital, London.
BMJ. 1993 Jan 16;306(6871):167-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6871.167.
To compare awareness of hypoglycaemia and physiological responses to hypoglycaemia with human and porcine insulin in diabetic patients who reported loss of hypoglycaemia awareness after transferring to human insulin.
Double blind randomised crossover study of clinical experience and physiological responses during slow fall hypoglycaemic clamping with porcine and human insulin.
Clinical investigation unit of teaching hospital recruiting from diabetes clinics of five teaching hospitals and one district general hospital.
17 patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus of more than five years' duration who had reported altered hypoglycaemia awareness within three months of transferring to human insulin.
Glycaemic control and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes during two months' treatment with each insulin. Glucose thresholds for physiological and symptomatic responses during clamping.
Glycaemic control did not change with either insulin. 136 hypoglycaemic episodes (eight severe) were reported with human insulin and 149 (nine severe) with porcine insulin (95% confidence interval -4 to 2.5, p = 0.63). 20 episodes of biochemical hypoglycaemia occurred with human insulin versus 18 with porcine insulin (-0.8 to 1, p = 0.78). During controlled hypoglycaemia the mean adrenaline response was 138 nmol/l/240 min for both insulins; neurohormonal responses were triggered at 3.0 (SE 0.2) versus 3.1 (0.2) mmol/l of glucose for adrenaline and 2.5 (0.1) versus 2.5 (0.1) mmol/l for subjective awareness.
These data suggest that human insulin per se does not affect the presentation of hypoglycaemia or the neurohumoral, symptomatic, and cognitive function responses to hypoglycaemia in insulin dependent diabetic patients with a history of hypoglycaemia unawareness.
在那些转用人类胰岛素后出现低血糖意识丧失的糖尿病患者中,比较使用人胰岛素和猪胰岛素时低血糖意识及对低血糖的生理反应。
在缓慢降血糖钳夹过程中,对使用猪胰岛素和人胰岛素的临床体验及生理反应进行双盲随机交叉研究。
教学医院的临床研究单位,从五家教学医院和一家地区综合医院的糖尿病诊所招募患者。
17例病程超过5年的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者,他们在转用人类胰岛素后3个月内报告低血糖意识发生改变。
使用每种胰岛素治疗两个月期间的血糖控制情况和低血糖发作频率。钳夹过程中生理和症状反应的血糖阈值。
两种胰岛素治疗时血糖控制均未改变。使用人胰岛素时报告了136次低血糖发作(8次严重),使用猪胰岛素时报告了149次(9次严重)(95%置信区间-4至2.5,p = 0.63)。使用人胰岛素时发生20次生化低血糖,使用猪胰岛素时发生18次(-0.8至1,p = 0.78)。在低血糖控制期间,两种胰岛素的平均肾上腺素反应均为138 nmol/l/240分钟;肾上腺素的神经激素反应在血糖为3.0(标准误0.2)mmol/l时触发,主观意识的神经激素反应在血糖为3.1(0.2)mmol/l时触发,而主观意识在血糖为2.5(0.1)mmol/l时触发,两种胰岛素情况相同。
这些数据表明,对于有低血糖无意识病史的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者,人胰岛素本身不会影响低血糖的表现或对低血糖的神经体液、症状及认知功能反应。