Matthews R S, Pandit P G, Bonigal S D, Wise R, Radcliffe K W
Department of Microbiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Genitourin Med. 1993 Feb;69(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.1.47.
First pass urine (FPU) samples were compared with urethral swab culture from 304 males attending a genitourinary medicine clinic using an enzyme immuno assay (EIA). All of the EIA positive samples were retested by incorporating a novel blocking reagent into the EIA protocol; 101 were positive by culture of which 83 were also positive by FPU EIA, an additional four were detected in FPU only and not by culture; 86 of these 87 were also confirmed positive by the blocking reagent. Discrepant results were evaluated by Syva MicroTrak. The sensitivity and specificity of FPU EIA as compared with urethral swab culture was 82.2% (83/101) and 98% (199/203) respectively with positive and negative predictive values of 95.4% (83/87) and 91.7% (199/217). Male urethral swab culture is more sensitive than FPU EIA; however, when culture is not available then FPU offers a reliable non-invasive alternative to swab EIA which may be of enormous benefit in community screening of asymptomatic as well as symptomatic patients.
采用酶免疫分析(EIA)对304名到泌尿生殖医学门诊就诊的男性患者的首次晨尿(FPU)样本与尿道拭子培养结果进行了比较。所有EIA阳性样本均通过在EIA检测方案中加入一种新型封闭试剂进行重新检测;101份样本培养呈阳性,其中83份FPU EIA也呈阳性,另外4份仅在FPU中检测到阳性而培养结果为阴性;这87份样本中的86份经封闭试剂检测也确认为阳性。不一致的结果通过Syva MicroTrak进行评估。与尿道拭子培养相比,FPU EIA的灵敏度和特异度分别为82.2%(83/101)和98%(199/203),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95.4%(83/87)和91.7%(199/217)。男性尿道拭子培养比FPU EIA更敏感;然而,当无法进行培养时,FPU为拭子EIA提供了一种可靠的非侵入性替代方法,这对于无症状和有症状患者的社区筛查可能具有巨大益处。