Suppr超能文献

两种学习强化形式对家长心肺复苏技能保持情况的影响。

The effect of two forms of learning reinforcement upon parental retention of CPR skills.

作者信息

Komelasky A L, Bond B S

出版信息

Pediatr Nurs. 1993 Jan-Feb;19(1):96-8, 77.

PMID:8446488
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of two forms of reinforcement upon the retention of CPR psychomotor skills in parents of high-risk infants.

METHOD

A pretest/posttest, 3-group design was done with a sample of 69 parent volunteers. Reinforcement with hands on practice was given to one group; a second group had reinforcement by observing a videotape, and the third group had no reinforcement strategy. CPR skills were measured by a checklist.

FINDINGS

Paired t-test showed significant differences in pretest and posttest scores for all three groups. Several CPR skills were missed on the final test more frequently than others. One-way ANOVA also showed a significant difference when comparing the control group with the hands-on reinforcement group.

CONCLUSIONS

Reinforcement of CPR skills should be an ongoing process. The groups who had reinforcement with hands-on practice retained the most skills.

摘要

目的

评估两种强化形式对高危婴儿家长心肺复苏术(CPR)操作技能保持情况的影响。

方法

对69名家长志愿者样本进行了前测/后测的三组设计。一组通过实际操作进行强化;第二组通过观看录像带进行强化,第三组没有强化策略。通过检查表测量CPR技能。

结果

配对t检验显示所有三组在前测和后测分数上存在显著差异。在最终测试中,几种CPR技能比其他技能更频繁地被遗漏。当将对照组与实际操作强化组进行比较时,单因素方差分析也显示出显著差异。

结论

CPR技能的强化应该是一个持续的过程。通过实际操作进行强化的组保留的技能最多。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验