Sallis J F, Condon S A, Goggin K J, Roby J J, Kolody B, Alcaraz J E
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, CA 92182.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993 Mar;64(1):25-31. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608775.
This study evaluates the test-retest reliability and validity of self-report measures of physical activity that can be self-administered in classroom settings to 4th grade students. Four different self-report formats were tested on 66 students. To assess test-retest reliabilities, self-report measures were administered on two occasions, separated by a 3-day interval between Time 1 (Friday) and Time 2 (Monday). One-way model intraclass reliabilities ranged from .51 to .74. Three days of monitoring with the Caltrac accelerometer were used as the validity criterion. Only one of the three weekly recalls, the Weekly Activity Checklist, was supported by significant validity correlations at both Time 1 (r = .34, p < .01) and Time 2 (r = .26, p < .05). The 1-day recall, Yesterday Activity Checklist, correlated significantly (r = .33, p < .01) with the previous day's Caltrac monitor score. Although two of the physical activity recall formats were found to be superior to two others, these data highlight the limitations of children's self-reports. Two self-report formats were found to have modest levels of reliability and validity with 4th grade children when administered in a classroom setting.
本研究评估了可在课堂环境中由四年级学生自行完成的身体活动自我报告测量方法的重测信度和效度。对66名学生测试了四种不同的自我报告形式。为评估重测信度,在两个时间点进行自我报告测量,时间1(周五)和时间2(周一)之间间隔3天。单向模型组内信度范围为0.51至0.74。使用Caltrac加速度计进行三天的监测作为效度标准。在时间1(r = 0.34,p < 0.01)和时间2(r = 0.26,p < 0.05)时,只有三项每周回顾中的一项,即《每周活动清单》,具有显著的效度相关性。1天回顾《昨日活动清单》与前一天Caltrac监测得分显著相关(r = 0.33,p < 0.01)。尽管发现两种身体活动回顾形式优于另外两种,但这些数据突出了儿童自我报告的局限性。当在课堂环境中对四年级儿童进行测量时,发现两种自我报告形式具有适度的信度和效度。