Hyltander A, Arfvidsson B, Körner U, Sandström R, Lundholm K
Department of Surgery, University of Göteborg, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Sweden.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993 Mar-Apr;17(2):158-64. doi: 10.1177/0148607193017002158.
The present study investigated whether infusion principles are significant factors that influence the nutritional efficiency of complete intravenous nutrition. For this purpose, three infusion modalities were evaluated in patients who underwent elective and uncomplicated cholecystectomy. The nutrition regimens were as follow: group 1, sequential infusion of fat plus amino acids at a constant rate over 12 hours during daytime followed by glucose infusion at a constant rate for 12 hours during nighttime; group 2, simultaneous infusion of all substrates at a constant rate over 24 hours; and group 3, simultaneous infusion of all substrates with bolus-based intermittent infusions during 60 minutes six times per day (24 hours). Nonprotein calories corresponded to 160% of the individually measured resting need and were provided as 60% carbohydrate and 40% fat. Nitrogen was provided as crystalline amino acids in solution at 0.2 g of nitrogen per kilogram per day. All patients were randomized into three comparable groups. Intermittent nutrition (group 3) was associated with a significantly higher thermic effect, which led to a significantly lower although still positive energy balance than either sequential nutrition (group 1) or constant nutrition (group 2). The mean daily nitrogen balance was, however, significantly improved in patients receiving intermittent nutrition, and this was accompanied by much higher plasma insulin levels as well as higher plasma amino acid concentrations. This study demonstrates that all substrates should be given simultaneously and that supplementation of intravenous nutrition in boluses, similar to meal feeding, gave the most pronounced protein accretion when compared with either sequential administration of total parenteral nutrition or administration of all admixtures with constant infusion over 24 hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究调查了输注原则是否为影响全胃肠外营养营养效率的重要因素。为此,对接受择期非复杂性胆囊切除术的患者评估了三种输注方式。营养方案如下:第1组,白天12小时内以恒定速率序贯输注脂肪加氨基酸,随后夜间12小时以恒定速率输注葡萄糖;第2组,24小时内以恒定速率同时输注所有底物;第3组,24小时内每天6次(共60分钟)以推注方式间歇性同时输注所有底物。非蛋白质热量相当于个体测量静息需求的160%,按60%碳水化合物和40%脂肪提供。氮以结晶氨基酸溶液形式按每天每千克0.2克氮提供。所有患者随机分为三个可比组。间歇性营养(第3组)的热效应显著更高,导致能量平衡显著低于序贯营养(第1组)或持续营养(第2组),尽管仍为正能量平衡。然而,接受间歇性营养的患者平均每日氮平衡显著改善,同时伴有更高的血浆胰岛素水平以及更高的血浆氨基酸浓度。本研究表明,所有底物应同时给予,与全胃肠外营养的序贯给药或24小时持续输注所有混合液相比,类似进餐喂养的静脉营养推注补充能产生最显著的蛋白质蓄积。(摘要截选至250字)