Suppr超能文献

一项关于在使用人绝经期促性腺激素或枸橼酸氯米芬刺激的周期中,人工授精与自然性交的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate.

作者信息

Karlström P O, Bergh T, Lundkvist O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1993 Mar;59(3):554-9.

PMID:8458457
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy of intrauterine insemination (IUI), direct intraperitoneal insemination, and intercourse in cycles stimulated with clomiphene citrate (CC) or human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG).

DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial with a 2(3) factorial design with eight different treatment alternatives. Only one cycle per couple was performed.

SETTINGS

The Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Hospital, Västerås and Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

PATIENTS

Of 157 randomized couples with unexplained infertility including 51 cases with minimal or mild endometriosis, 148 were selected for comparison.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pregnancy rate (PR).

RESULTS

Follicular stimulation with hMG gave a higher PR than with CC in the insemination cycles, 19% (10/52) and 4% (2/49), respectively, but the PRs in intercourse cycles were not significantly different for hMG and CC, 13% (3/24) and 17% (4/23), respectively. Insemination cycles and intercourse cycles had a similar overall PR, 12% (12/101) and 13% (7/47), respectively. Furthermore, IUI and direct intraperitoneal insemination did not differ in efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Follicular stimulation with hMG is more effective than CC in insemination cycles, but insemination as such seems to have no beneficial effect on the PR in stimulated cycles for treatment of unexplained infertility.

摘要

目的

确定在枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)或人绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)刺激的周期中,宫腔内人工授精(IUI)、直接腹腔内授精和自然性交的相对疗效。

设计

采用2(3)析因设计的前瞻性随机试验,有八种不同的治疗方案。每对夫妇仅进行一个周期的治疗。

地点

瑞典韦斯特罗斯中央医院妇产科以及乌普萨拉大学乌普萨拉学术医院。

患者

157对因不明原因不孕而随机分组的夫妇,其中包括51例轻度或中度子宫内膜异位症患者,选取148例进行比较。

主要观察指标

妊娠率(PR)。

结果

在授精周期中,用hMG进行卵泡刺激的妊娠率高于用CC刺激的,分别为19%(10/52)和4%(2/49),但在自然性交周期中,hMG和CC的妊娠率无显著差异,分别为13%(3/24)和17%(4/23)。授精周期和自然性交周期的总体妊娠率相似,分别为12%(12/101)和13%(7/47)。此外,IUI和直接腹腔内授精的疗效无差异。

结论

在授精周期中,用hMG进行卵泡刺激比用CC更有效,但对于不明原因不孕的治疗,授精本身似乎对刺激周期的妊娠率没有有益影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验