Suppr超能文献

肠球菌的菌种鉴定及高水平氨基糖苷类耐药性测定。1985 - 1991年无菌体液分离株的比较研究。

Species identification and determination of high-level aminoglycoside resistance among enterococci. Comparison study of sterile body fluid isolates, 1985-1991.

作者信息

Buschelman B J, Bale M J, Jones R N

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Feb;16(2):119-22. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90005-r.

Abstract

Enterococcus spp. have become the third most common cause of nosocomial infections. High-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLR), an important clinical concern, has been associated with some species of the enterococci. We evaluated the Vitek and API 20S systems for species identification and the Vitek for the detection of HLR. Enterococci from nosocomial infections (208 strains) at the University of Iowa Hospital (1985-1991) were tested by Vitek, API 20S, and reference methods. The error rate for species identification was 6.7% for the API 20S and 5.8% for the Vitek Gram-positive identification (GPI) cards. Both systems tended to incorrectly identify other enterococcal species as Enterococcus faecium. HLR was found in Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium isolates only. The highest rates of HLR to streptomycin alone (17.9%) and with gentamicin (13.5%) was observed among E. faecalis strains, and to gentamicin alone (7.3%) was found among E. faecium isolates. No apparent differences in HLR rates were found from year-to-year over the 7-year enterococcus sample interval. Susceptibility errors for Vitek were among the streptomycin tests only. Our results demonstrated acceptable performance by the Vitek cards for enterococcal species identification and the detection of HLR. API 20S also provided an acceptable ability to speciate the enterococci within its data base, however, both systems must be improved by adding other clinical important Enterococcus species.

摘要

肠球菌已成为医院感染的第三大常见病因。高水平氨基糖苷类耐药性(HLR)是一个重要的临床问题,与某些肠球菌种类相关。我们评估了Vitek和API 20S系统用于菌种鉴定,以及Vitek用于检测HLR的情况。对爱荷华大学医院(1985 - 1991年)医院感染的肠球菌(208株)采用Vitek、API 20S和参考方法进行检测。API 20S系统的菌种鉴定错误率为6.7%,Vitek革兰氏阳性鉴定(GPI)卡的错误率为5.8%。两个系统都倾向于将其他肠球菌种类错误鉴定为粪肠球菌。仅在粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌分离株中发现HLR。粪肠球菌菌株中单独对链霉素的HLR发生率最高(17.9%),对链霉素和庆大霉素联合的HLR发生率为13.5%,屎肠球菌分离株中单独对庆大霉素的HLR发生率为7.3%。在7年的肠球菌样本间隔期间,逐年的HLR发生率没有明显差异。Vitek的药敏错误仅出现在链霉素检测中。我们的结果表明,Vitek卡用于肠球菌菌种鉴定和HLR检测的性能可以接受。API 20S在其数据库内对肠球菌进行菌种鉴定的能力也可以接受,然而,两个系统都必须通过增加其他临床重要的肠球菌种类来改进。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验