Tokhi A M, Peiris J S, Scotland S M, Willshaw G A, Smith H R, Cheasty T
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Epidemiol Infect. 1993 Apr;110(2):197-208. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800068114.
Two cohorts of 10 and 16 calves were followed at weekly or fortnightly intervals from 4-28 and 1-9 weeks respectively to determine whether natural infection by Vero cytotoxin (VT) producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) occurred. Ninety-one of 171 (53%) faecal specimens were VTEC positive and 20-80% of animals at any given time excreted VTEC. Of 104 VTEC strains studied further, 6 different serogroups (O 22.H16; O 25.H5; O 49.H-; O 86.H26; O 88.H25; O 153.H12) and an untypable strain (O? .H21) were identified. All strains belonging to the same serotype had identical profiles of reactivity with DNA probes to toxins VT1 or 2, LTI or II and a probe (CVD419) derived from a plasmid carried by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O 157.H7. Four of these serotypes were found in the faecal flora of the calves, taken as a group, throughout the 4-month study period. Sixty percent of the strains hybridized with the probe for VT1, 4% with the probe for VT2, and 36% with both probes. Faecal VTEC were significantly associated with overt diarrhoeal illness in animals < 10 weeks of age, but no characteristic profile of markers (serotype or hybridization pattern) in E. coli isolates was associated with diarrhoea. A serological response to VT1 was detected in some animals, but faecal VT1 VTEC excretion persisted in spite of seroconversion. VT1 seroconversion was not associated with diarrhoea. A serological response to VT2 was not detected even in those animals excreting VT2 VTEC in the faeces.
分别对两组小牛进行跟踪,一组10头,另一组16头,跟踪间隔为每周或每两周一次,跟踪时间分别为4至28周和1至9周,以确定是否发生了由产生维罗细胞毒素(VT)的大肠杆菌(VTEC)引起的自然感染。171份粪便标本中有91份(53%)VTEC呈阳性,在任何给定时间,20%至80%的动物排出VTEC。在进一步研究的104株VTEC菌株中,鉴定出6种不同的血清型(O 22.H16;O 25.H5;O 49.H-;O 86.H26;O 88.H25;O 153.H12)和1株无法分型的菌株(O?.H21)。属于同一血清型的所有菌株与针对毒素VT1或2、LTI或II的DNA探针以及源自肠出血性大肠杆菌O 157.H7携带的质粒的探针(CVD419)具有相同的反应谱。在为期4个月的研究期间,作为一个整体的小牛粪便菌群中发现了其中4种血清型。60%的菌株与VT1探针杂交,4%与VT2探针杂交,36%与两种探针都杂交。粪便VTEC与10周龄以下动物的明显腹泻疾病显著相关,但大肠杆菌分离株中没有特征性的标记谱(血清型或杂交模式)与腹泻相关。在一些动物中检测到对VT1的血清学反应,但尽管发生了血清转化,粪便中VT1 VTEC的排泄仍持续存在。VT1血清转化与腹泻无关。即使在粪便中排出VT2 VTEC的动物中也未检测到对VT2的血清学反应。