Carroll B J, Phillips E H, Rosenthal R, Gleischman S, Bray J F
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Surg Endosc. 1996 Mar;10(3):319-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00187380.
In 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the feasibility, reliability, and cost of routine laparoscopic cholangiography were prospectively studied.
Fluoroscopic cholangiograms with multiple exposures were successfully completed in all patients in an average time of 6.9 min.
Twenty-one percent were abnormal, and 15 common duct stones and 6 significant anatomic anomalies detected. Thirteen out of 15 patients with common duct stones had preoperative suspicion of common duct stones. Two out of 15 were completely unsuspected. The average cost of cholangiography was $768, and there were no complications related to the procedure. There were no false interpretations.
When compared with selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), routine laparoscopic cholangiography is safer, more accurate, and less costly, and may have the added benefit of potentially reducing iatrogenic injuries in patients with anatomic variations. Routine laparoscopic cholangiography should be considered by all surgeons.
对连续100例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,前瞻性研究常规腹腔镜胆管造影的可行性、可靠性及成本。
所有患者均成功完成多次曝光的荧光胆管造影,平均用时6.9分钟。
21%异常,检测到15枚胆总管结石及6处显著解剖异常。15例胆总管结石患者中,13例术前怀疑有胆总管结石。15例中有2例完全未被怀疑。胆管造影的平均成本为768美元,且无与该操作相关的并发症。无错误解读。
与选择性术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相比,常规腹腔镜胆管造影更安全、更准确且成本更低,可能还有潜在减少解剖变异患者医源性损伤的额外益处。所有外科医生均应考虑常规腹腔镜胆管造影。