• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗保健领域建立共识:使用名义群体技术指南

Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique.

作者信息

Allen Jane, Dyas Jane, Jones Margaret

机构信息

Nottingham Primary Care Research Partnership, Broxtowe and Hucknall Primary Care Trust.

出版信息

Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Mar;9(3):110-4. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.3.12432.

DOI:10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.3.12432
PMID:15028996
Abstract

The nominal group technique has been used in the health care sector in the development of guidelines and the identification of research priorities. The methodology suits research that includes both health professionals and consumers, since it allows for the free exchange of opinions and the generation of ideas within a structured and non-hierarchical discussion forum. This article describes the process of planning and running a nominal group and uses examples from a primary-care-based study to illustrate some of the advantages of using this method, and also the practical implications of using the technique in consensus development.

摘要

名义群体技术已在医疗保健领域用于制定指南和确定研究重点。该方法适用于涉及医疗专业人员和消费者的研究,因为它能在一个结构化且无等级之分的讨论论坛中实现意见的自由交流和想法的产生。本文描述了规划和开展名义群体的过程,并以一项基于初级保健的研究为例,说明使用该方法的一些优点,以及在共识形成过程中使用该技术的实际意义。

相似文献

1
Building consensus in health care: a guide to using the nominal group technique.在医疗保健领域建立共识:使用名义群体技术指南
Br J Community Nurs. 2004 Mar;9(3):110-4. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2004.9.3.12432.
2
Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.德尔菲调查技术的研究指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15.
3
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
A comparison of two consensus methods for classifying morbidities in a single professional group showed the same outcomes.对单一专业群体中疾病分类的两种共识方法进行比较,结果显示相同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;59(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
5
An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study.一种用于调查德尔菲研究各轮之间发生情况的可及分析方法。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1016-24.
6
A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines.用于制定临床指南的正式共识方法比较。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Oct;11(4):218-24. doi: 10.1258/135581906778476553.
7
A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.对德尔菲技术作为护理研究方法的批判性综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00044-4.
8
The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice?名义群体技术:一种适用于全科医疗的研究工具?
Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76.
9
Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability.英国基层医疗中长期处方适宜性的指标:共识发展、表面效度与内容效度、可行性及可靠性
Qual Health Care. 1998 Sep;7(3):130-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.3.130.
10
The development of evidence based guidelines for clinical practice portfolios.基于证据的临床实践组合指南的制定。
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov;31(8):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.027. Epub 2011 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis.评估上睑下垂的关键术前和术后因素。
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 4;5:1609113. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1609113. eCollection 2025.
2
'I'm Not a Bad Mom, I'm a Sick Mom': Using Photovoice to Examine Parental Recovery Narratives Given Institutional Constraints.“我不是坏妈妈,我是生病的妈妈”:在机构限制下,运用照片声音法审视父母的康复叙事
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jun;47(5):e70056. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70056.
3
Building consensus on prescribing self-directed occupational therapy activities: A Delphi study.
就自行指导的职业治疗活动的处方达成共识:一项德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Jun;72(3):e70029. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70029.
4
Using maternal sepsis patient journeys to map and prioritise barriers to quality maternal healthcare in Malawi: a multidisciplinary stakeholder consultation workshop.利用马拉维孕产妇败血症患者就医过程来梳理优质孕产妇医疗保健的障碍并确定其优先顺序:多学科利益相关方咨询研讨会
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2451467. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2451467. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
Engaging Community Pharmacies in Promoting Outpatient Medication Safety - Identifying and Prioritizing Research Needs by Modified Nominal Group Technique.让社区药房参与促进门诊用药安全——通过改良名义小组技术确定研究需求并进行优先级排序。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 3;18:1-18. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S483642. eCollection 2025.
6
Development and refinement of patient care recommendations in brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer using nominal group technique workshops.使用名义群体技术研讨会制定和完善局部晚期宫颈癌近距离放射治疗的患者护理建议
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 13;33(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08997-z.
7
Development of explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multidisciplinary qualitative study.明确界定 2 型糖尿病患者使用抗糖尿病药物的潜在不适当处方:一项多学科定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0309290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309290. eCollection 2024.
8
Content of a wound care mobile application for newly graduated nurses: an e-Delphi study.面向新毕业护士的伤口护理移动应用程序内容:一项电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 May 16;23(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02003-x.
9
Barriers and enablers of post-COVID-19 acute care follow-up in Nigeria from service providers' perspective: a nominal group technique.从服务提供者的角度来看,尼日利亚 COVID-19 后急性护理随访的障碍和促进因素:名义团体技术。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11032-w.
10
Selecting implementation strategies to improve implementation of integrated PrEP for pregnant and postpartum populations in Kenya: a sequential explanatory mixed methods analysis.选择实施策略以改善肯尼亚孕妇和产后人群综合暴露前预防的实施情况:一项序贯解释性混合方法分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Aug 14;4(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00481-9.