• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验口语中引语检索的非分解理论:动词的检索

Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: retrieval of verbs.

作者信息

Roelofs A

机构信息

Nijmegen Institute for Cognition Research and Information Technology, University of Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):59-87. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90062-z.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90062-z
PMID:8482071
Abstract

Theories of lexical access in speaking differ in whether they assume that words are accessed in a conceptually decomposed or non-decomposed way. In this paper, two experiments are reported that test the non-decompositional theory and computer model proposed by Roelofs (1992a). Subjects had to name pictured actions using verbs and ignore distractor verbs superimposed on the pictures. According to the theory, semantic inhibition should be obtained from distractor cohyponym verbs that are the names of other pictures in the experiment. By contrast, semantic facilitation should be obtained from hyponyms of the target verbs. Both predictions were empirically confirmed, both qualitatively and quantitatively. These findings support the proposed non-decompositional theory and computer model. Furthermore, they refute a recent attempt to deal with a class of retrieval problems within the decompositional framework. Bierwisch and Schreuder (1992) propose to solve the hyperonym problem (Levelt, 1989) by an inhibitory channel in the mental lexicon between a word and its hyperonyms. This predicts semantic inhibition by hyponyms, instead of the observed facilitation.

摘要

关于言语中词汇提取的理论,在是否假设词汇是以概念分解或非分解的方式被提取这一点上存在差异。在本文中,报告了两项实验,它们对Roelofs(1992a)提出的非分解理论和计算机模型进行了测试。受试者必须使用动词来命名图片中的动作,并忽略叠加在图片上的干扰动词。根据该理论,应该从作为实验中其他图片名称的干扰同下义词动词中获得语义抑制。相比之下,应该从目标动词的下义词中获得语义促进。这两个预测在定性和定量方面都得到了实证证实。这些发现支持了所提出的非分解理论和计算机模型。此外,它们反驳了最近在分解框架内处理一类检索问题的尝试。Bierwisch和Schreuder(1992)提议通过心理词库中一个词与其上位词之间的抑制通道来解决上位词问题(Levelt,1989)。这预测的是下义词的语义抑制,而不是观察到的促进作用。

相似文献

1
Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: retrieval of verbs.检验口语中引语检索的非分解理论:动词的检索
Cognition. 1993 Apr;47(1):59-87. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90062-z.
2
A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.言语中词元提取的扩散激活理论。
Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):107-42. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f.
3
The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?图片-单词干扰范式中的语义干扰效应:反应集重要吗?
Cognition. 2000 May 15;75(2):B51-64. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00082-7.
4
More is not always better: a response to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt.更多并不总是更好:对罗洛夫斯、迈耶和莱尔特的回应。
Cognition. 1998 Dec;69(2):231-41. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00057-2.
5
A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997).关于口语模型中词元/词位区分的一个实例:评卡拉马佐和米奥佐(1997)
Cognition. 1998 Dec;69(2):219-30. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00056-0.
6
Which words are activated during bilingual word production?在双语单词产生过程中,哪些词被激活了?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):96-109. doi: 10.1037/a0017677.
7
Noun-verb dissociation in aphasia: the role of imageability and functional locus of the lesion.失语症中的名词-动词分离:可想象性及病变功能部位的作用
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(1):73-89. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.006.
8
The trouble with nouns and verbs in Greek fluent aphasia.希腊语流利性失语症中名词和动词的问题。
J Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
9
Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia.我们能否将动词与其论元结构分开?一项失语症群体研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jan;52(1):59-70. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12253. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10
Lexical representations of written nouns and verbs in Italian.意大利语中书面名词和动词的词汇表征。
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):250-63. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2522.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting the prime in priming: Using prime processing behavior to predict target structural processing.启动中的启动因素:利用启动加工行为预测目标结构加工
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jan 30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02643-3.
2
The role of animacy in language production: evidence from bare noun naming.生命性在语言产生中的作用:来自光杆名词命名的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1461-1473. doi: 10.1177/17470218241281868. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
3
Neural Correlates of Semantic Interference and Phonological Facilitation in Picture Naming: A Systematic Review and Coordinate-Based Meta-analysis.
图片命名中语义干扰和语音促进的神经关联:一项系统综述和基于坐标的元分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Mar;35(1):35-53. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09631-9. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
4
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
5
Structural priming during comprehension: A pattern from many pieces.理解中的结构启动:来自多方面的模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):882-896. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02209-7. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Error-based learning and lexical competition in word production: Evidence from multilingual naming.基于错误的学习和词汇竞争在单词产生中的作用:来自多语言命名的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213765. eCollection 2019.
7
A Review on Grammatical Gender Agreement in Speech Production.言语产生中语法性一致的综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02754. eCollection 2018.
8
A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.玫瑰易名,芬芳依旧:对汉奇和梅德巴赫观点的重新诠释
Lang Cogn Process. 2013;28(5):701-716. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.682071. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
9
Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences.概念结构在复杂句子的生成中调节结构启动。
J Mem Lang. 2003 Nov;49(4):537-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.002.
10
Lesions to Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Impair Lexical Interference Control in Word Production.外侧前额叶皮层损伤会损害词汇生成中的词汇干扰控制。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;9:721. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00721. eCollection 2015.