Rasmussen H, Larsen M J, Skeie E
Department of Surgery, Sundby Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dan Med Bull. 1993 Apr;40(2):252-4.
A comparison of two different wound dressings was carried out in a series of 88 paediatric patients. The patients were randomised to either Steristrip plus Cutiplast, a conventional absorbent wound dressing, or to DuoDERM, an occlusive adhesive dressing. The study, set up to show which was the most convenient dressing for minor outpatient surgery, focused on the psychological aspects of operative treatment of infants and children. The results showed that the DuoDERM group had fewer bandage changes than the Steristrip & Cutiplast group, although this was not significant. Significantly less pain was experienced on removal of the wound dressing in the DuoDERM group. When dressed with DuoDERM, children could be bathed in the immediate postoperative period without complication. In conclusion, an occlusive wound dressing (DuoDERM) seems to minimize the physical and psychological trauma to the infant or child and reduce the disruption to the child's and the parents' daily routines.
对88名儿科患者进行了两种不同伤口敷料的比较。患者被随机分为两组，一组使用传统吸水性伤口敷料Steristrip加Cutiplast，另一组使用封闭性粘性敷料DuoDERM。该研究旨在确定哪种敷料对门诊小手术最为方便，重点关注婴幼儿手术治疗的心理方面。结果显示，DuoDERM组的绷带更换次数比Steristrip加Cutiplast组少，尽管差异不显著。DuoDERM组在拆除伤口敷料时疼痛明显较轻。使用DuoDERM包扎时，儿童在术后即刻即可洗澡，且无并发症。总之，封闭性伤口敷料（DuoDERM）似乎能将对婴幼儿的身体和心理创伤降至最低，并减少对儿童及其父母日常生活的干扰。
