Suppr超能文献

麻风结节性麻风血清学诊断中麻风抗体吸收试验、麻风分枝杆菌提取物酶联免疫吸附测定和明胶颗粒凝集试验的比较评估

Comparative assessment of the leprosy antibody absorption test, Mycobacterium leprae extract enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and gelatin particle agglutination test for serodiagnosis of lepromatous leprosy.

作者信息

Escobar-Gutiérrez A, Amezcua M E, Pastén S, Pallares F, Cázares J V, Pulido R M, Flores O, Castro E, Rodríguez O

机构信息

Departamento de Investigaciones Inmunológicas, Instituto Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Mexico City, DF.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1329-33. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1329-1333.1993.

Abstract

A comparative assessment of three serological methods for leprosy diagnosis (the fluorescent leprosy antibody absorption [FLA-ABS] test, the Mycobacterium leprae soluble-extract enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], and the M. leprae particle agglutination [MLPA] test) was carried out. The objective was to identify their performance in clinical and epidemiological diagnosis of leprosy. The study group included 45 lepromatous leprosy patients under treatment. Specificity was > 95% for all three assays, and sensitivity was 95, 58, and 74% for the FLA-ABS test, the MLPA test, and the ELISA, respectively. The only cross-reactivity for M. tuberculosis-infected patients was with the soluble-extract ELISA. Although the FLA-ABS test displayed the highest specificity and sensitivity values, it can only be used in well-developed laboratories, and the patient's clinical and epidemiological background must be considered when results are interpreted because the test remains positive after therapeutic success and could be positive for some household contacts. The MLPA test is easier to perform and interpret, and it is adequate for small laboratories and epidemiological studies intended to detect active untreated or irregularly treated leprosy cases. Therefore, the FLA-ABS and MLPA tests are complementary, and both should be used for serodiagnosis of leprosy.

摘要

对三种用于麻风病诊断的血清学方法(荧光麻风抗体吸收[FLA-ABS]试验、麻风杆菌可溶性提取物酶联免疫吸附测定[ELISA]和麻风杆菌颗粒凝集[MLPA]试验)进行了比较评估。目的是确定它们在麻风病临床和流行病学诊断中的性能。研究组包括45例正在接受治疗的瘤型麻风病患者。所有三种检测方法的特异性均>95%,FLA-ABS试验、MLPA试验和ELISA的敏感性分别为95%、58%和74%。结核分枝杆菌感染患者唯一的交叉反应是与可溶性提取物ELISA。虽然FLA-ABS试验显示出最高的特异性和敏感性值,但它只能在设备完善的实验室中使用,并且在解释结果时必须考虑患者的临床和流行病学背景,因为该试验在治疗成功后仍呈阳性,并且对一些家庭接触者也可能呈阳性。MLPA试验更容易操作和解释,适用于小型实验室以及旨在检测未经治疗或治疗不规律的活动性麻风病病例的流行病学研究。因此,FLA-ABS试验和MLPA试验是互补的,两者都应用于麻风病的血清学诊断。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Detection of antibodies in sera of leprosy patients and contacts by enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA).
Nihon Rai Gakkai Zasshi. 1984 Jan-Mar;53(1):32-7. doi: 10.5025/hansen1977.53.32.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验