• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Application of a general health policy model in the American health care crisis.一种通用健康政策模型在美国医疗保健危机中的应用。
J R Soc Med. 1993 May;86(5):277-81. doi: 10.1177/014107689308600512.
2
Oregon's health care rationing plan. Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.俄勒冈州的医疗保健配给计划。纽约州医学协会生物伦理问题委员会。
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):104-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599586.
3
Managing care: two views from Oregon.管理医疗：来自俄勒冈州的两种观点。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1995 Oct-Dec;10(4):321-4. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740100407.
4
Rationing health care: does it work?
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2002 Summer;65(3):13-7.
5
Paradigm shift in American health care: are we ready for a comprehensive system?美国医疗保健的范式转变：我们准备好迎接一个全面的体系了吗？
Health Matrix Clevel. 1991 Summer;1(2):259-65; discussion 267-73.
6
Is rationing ever ethically justifiable?资源配给在伦理上是否有正当理由？
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 2002 Summer;65(3):18-9.
7
The Oregon Health Plan. A process for reform.俄勒冈健康计划。一项改革进程。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jul;75(7):1074-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199307000-00015.
8
Oregon's health care plan: one state's model.俄勒冈州的医疗保健计划：一个州的模式。
J Health Soc Policy. 1995;6(4):25-35. doi: 10.1300/J045v06n04_02.
9
State model: Oregon. The ups and downs of Oregon's rationing plan.州模式：俄勒冈州。俄勒冈州配给计划的起伏。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993 Summer;12(2):66-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.2.66.
10
An ethical approach to health care reform in Canada: a comparison of the Canadian and American health care systems.加拿大医疗保健改革的伦理方法：加拿大与美国医疗保健系统的比较。
Health Law Can. 1998 Feb;18(3):75-95.

引用本文的文献

1
A weighty matter: heaviness influences the evaluation of disease severity, drug effectiveness, and side effects.沉甸甸的问题：体重会影响对疾病严重程度、药物疗效和副作用的评估。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 11;8(11):e78307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078307. eCollection 2013.
2
Obesity and symptom burden in family medicine patients.肥胖与家庭医学患者的症状负担。
Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):165-72. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00003.
3
Utility-based Quality of Life measures in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中基于效用的生活质量测量
Qual Life Res. 2006 May;15(4):631-43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-4364-8.
4
Comparison of German language versions of the QWB-SA and SF-36 evaluating outcomes for patients with prostate disease.德语版QWB-SA和SF-36对前列腺疾病患者评估结果的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(2):165-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1016771205405.
5
Healthcare resource consumption in terminal care.临终关怀中的医疗资源消耗。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Jan;11(1):2-12. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199711010-00002.
6
Opinion polling and decision making: a critical appraisal of quality of life assessment.
Qual Life Res. 1994 Apr;3(2):155-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00435258.
7
An appraisal of health care in the USA.对美国医疗保健的评估。
J R Soc Med. 1994 Sep;87(9):544-5. doi: 10.1177/014107689408700919.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.用于经济评估的健康状态效用测量。
J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.
2
A general health policy model: update and applications.一种通用健康政策模型：更新与应用
Health Serv Res. 1988 Jun;23(2):203-35.
3
Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.测量健康相关生活质量的效用方法。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):593-603. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1.
4
Health promotion and the compression of morbidity.健康促进与发病期的压缩
Lancet. 1989 Mar 4;1(8636):481-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91376-7.
5
Americans' views on health care: a study in contradictions.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1990 Winter;9(4):149-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.9.4.149.
6
Carotid endarterectomy for elderly patients: predicting complications.老年患者的颈动脉内膜切除术：并发症预测
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):747-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-10-747.
7
The health care resource allocation debate. Defining our terms.
JAMA. 1991 Dec 18;266(23):3328-31.
8
Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue.俄勒冈州的医疗保健优先事项设定。成本效益与救援原则相遇。
JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2218-25.
9
Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices.健康与医疗实践的成本效益分析基础
N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):716-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304.

一种通用健康政策模型在美国医疗保健危机中的应用。

Application of a general health policy model in the American health care crisis.

作者信息

Kaplan R M

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0622.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 1993 May;86(5):277-81. doi: 10.1177/014107689308600512.

DOI:10.1177/014107689308600512
PMID:8505751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1294005/
Abstract

There is near consensus that the US health care system requires reform. Only a quarter of the American public has faith in the current system. Health care was one of the major issues considered in the 1992 US presidential election and the search for innovative solutions has transcended administrations.

摘要

人们几乎一致认为，美国医疗保健系统需要改革。只有四分之一的美国公众对现行系统有信心。医疗保健是1992年美国总统大选中考虑的主要问题之一，对创新解决方案的探索已经超越了不同政府。