• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

托槽材料、结扎力和磨损对正畸托槽摩擦力的影响。

The influence of bracket material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets.

作者信息

Keith O, Jones S P, Davies E H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450.

出版信息

Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):109-15. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.109.

DOI:10.1179/bjo.20.2.109
PMID:8518264
Abstract

Planar static frictional phenomena were investigated for two types of ceramic and one type of stainless steel orthodontic bracket against rectangular stainless steel archwire. The brackets studied were 'Starfire' (single crystal aluminium oxide), 'Allure III' (polycrystalline aluminium oxide), and 'Dentaurum' (stainless steel). The investigative parameters were: bracket material, force of ligation and whether the brackets were new or 'worn'. Without exception, both types of ceramic bracket produced greater frictional resistance than the stainless steel brackets throughout testing. At a ligation force of 500 g, the Starfire bracket gave the greatest frictional resistance. At ligation forces of 200 and 50 g, the greatest frictional resistance was seen with Allure III. After a period of simulated wear, frictional resistance of Starfire tended to increase at the greatest ligation load while that of both ceramics decreased slightly at the two lower ligation loads. The ceramic brackets caused abrasive wear of the archwire surfaces and the consequent wear debris may have contributed to the changes in frictional resistance seen with Starfire and Allure III. Dentaurum brackets produced minimal frictional resistance in any test and negligible change with wear.

摘要

研究了两种陶瓷正畸托槽和一种不锈钢正畸托槽与矩形不锈钢弓丝之间的平面静摩擦现象。所研究的托槽分别是“星火”(单晶氧化铝)、“魅力III”(多晶氧化铝)和“登泰克”(不锈钢)。研究参数包括:托槽材料、结扎力以及托槽是新的还是“磨损的”。在整个测试过程中,两种陶瓷托槽无一例外都比不锈钢托槽产生更大的摩擦阻力。在结扎力为500克时,“星火”托槽产生的摩擦阻力最大。在结扎力为200克和50克时,“魅力III”托槽产生的摩擦阻力最大。经过一段时间的模拟磨损后,在最大结扎负荷下,“星火”托槽的摩擦阻力趋于增加,而在两个较低结扎负荷下,两种陶瓷托槽的摩擦阻力均略有下降。陶瓷托槽导致弓丝表面出现磨料磨损,由此产生的磨损碎屑可能是“星火”和“魅力III”托槽摩擦阻力变化的原因。在任何测试中,“登泰克”托槽产生的摩擦阻力最小,且磨损后变化可忽略不计。

相似文献

1
The influence of bracket material, ligation force and wear on frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets.托槽材料、结扎力和磨损对正畸托槽摩擦力的影响。
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):109-15. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.109.
2
Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.正畸托槽与弓丝之间的摩擦阻力:一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1015.
3
Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.使用涂有特氟龙的结扎丝与各种托槽 - 弓丝组合时的摩擦力。
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0063:FRUTLW>2.0.CO;2.
4
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.带有金属槽插入物的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2006 Nov;22(2):147-52.
5
A study to compare the effects of simulated torquing forces on pre-adjusted orthodontic brackets.一项比较模拟加力对预调正畸托槽影响的研究。
Br J Orthod. 1994 Nov;21(4):359-65. doi: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.359.
6
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.弓丝与陶瓷托槽之间摩擦力的体外评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.005.
7
A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.正畸托槽与弓丝之间摩擦力的比较研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Dec;100(6):513-22. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70091-A.
8
A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.自锁式与传统正畸托槽系统的比较。
Br J Orthod. 1997 Nov;24(4):309-17. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.4.309.
9
Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance.三种现代塑料托槽槽底表面粗糙度与摩擦力的研究
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):177-83. doi: 10.2319/030313-179.1. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.具有传统槽沟、釉质槽沟和金属槽沟嵌体的多晶陶瓷托槽的静摩擦阻力
Aust Orthod J. 2007 May;23(1):36-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a ceramic active self-ligating bracket on retraction/tipping/ rotation of canine, premolar mesialization, and transverse arch dimensions: A preliminary single-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.陶瓷主动自结扎托槽对尖牙远中移动/倾斜/旋转、前磨牙近中移动及牙弓宽度的影响:一项初步单盲半口随机临床试验
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Oct 21;18:81. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of the Perception of Pain during Fixed Orthodontic Treatment with Metal and Ceramic Brackets.固定正畸治疗中使用金属和陶瓷托槽时疼痛感知的比较。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Feb;11(Suppl 1):S30-S35. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_218_18.
3
Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.
正畸学中的滑动阻力:误解还是方法错误?一项系统评价及测试方案建议
Korean J Orthod. 2018 Jul;48(4):268-280. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.4.268. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
4
Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires covered with a polyether ether ketone tube.聚醚醚酮管覆盖的正畸丝的力学性能。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):442-449. doi: 10.2319/082417-572.1. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Static and kinetic frictional forces of silica-insert ceramic brackets with coated archwires in artificial saliva.人工唾液中带涂层弓丝的二氧化硅植入陶瓷托槽的静摩擦力和动摩擦力
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Nov-Dec;14(6):412-417. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.218567.
6
Fluoride influences nickel-titanium orthodontic wires' surface texture and friction resistance.氟化物会影响镍钛正畸丝的表面质地和摩擦阻力。
J Orthod Sci. 2016 Oct-Dec;5(4):121-126. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.192114.
7
A novel method of coating orthodontic archwires with nanoparticles.一种用纳米颗粒包覆正畸弓丝的新方法。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 May;7(5):30-3.
8
In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.两种陶瓷正畸托槽与一种不锈钢托槽在搭配两种弓丝时的摩擦力的体外评估。
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):42-6. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.156028.
9
Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets.美观型和半美观型自锁托槽摩擦阻力的比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S116-20. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155852.
10
Frictional resistance of three types of ceramic brackets.三种类型陶瓷托槽的摩擦阻力
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2014 Jan 1;4(4):e3. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4403. eCollection 2013 Oct.