Kostrikis L G, Cao Y, Ngai H, Moore J P, Ho D D
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA.
J Virol. 1996 Jan;70(1):445-58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.1.445-458.1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) M group strains have been assigned to date to nine distinct genetic subtypes, designated A through I, according to phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences of their env or gag genes. Whether there is any relationship between phylogenetic subtypes and the neutralization serotypes is not clear, yet defining the nature of any such relationship by mathematical means would be of major importance for the development of globally effective HIV-1 vaccines. We have therefore developed a quantitative method to analyze serum neutralization of HIV-1 isolates and to identify HIV-1 neutralization serotypes. This method involves calculations of the neutralization index, N(i), a newly defined parameter derived from plots generated from in vitro neutralization assays, calculations of pairwise serum-virus vector distances, and cluster analyses. We have applied this approach to analyze three independent neutralization matrices involving primary HIV-1 strains and sera from genetic subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and I. Detailed serum and HIV-1 isolate cluster analyses have shown that in general, the identified neutralization serotypes do not directly correlate with HIV-1 genetic subtypes. These results suggest that neutralization serotypes do not during natural HIV-1 infection are not governed by antibodies directed against simple epitopes within gp120 monomers. A significant proportion (28%) of 1,213 combinations of sera and HIV-1 isolates caused serum-dependent infectivity enhancement [negative N(i) values] rather than neutralization. We also noted that negative N(i) values tended to correlate better with certain HIV-1 isolates rather than with HIV-1-positive sera. Syncytium-inducing variants of HIV-1 were slightly more likely than non-syncytium-inducing variants to undergo serum-dependent infectivity enhancement, although the latter variants could clearly be susceptible to enhancement.
根据1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)M组毒株env或gag基因核苷酸序列的系统发育分析,迄今已将其分为9种不同的基因亚型,命名为A至I。系统发育亚型与中和血清型之间是否存在任何关系尚不清楚,然而,通过数学方法确定任何此类关系的性质对于开发全球有效的HIV-1疫苗至关重要。因此,我们开发了一种定量方法来分析HIV-1分离株的血清中和作用并鉴定HIV-1中和血清型。该方法包括计算中和指数N(i)(一个从体外中和试验生成的图中得出的新定义参数)、计算血清-病毒向量对之间的距离以及聚类分析。我们已应用此方法分析了涉及A、B、C、D、E、F和I基因亚型的原发性HIV-1毒株和血清的三个独立中和矩阵。详细的血清和HIV-1分离株聚类分析表明,一般来说,鉴定出的中和血清型与HIV-1基因亚型没有直接相关性。这些结果表明,在自然HIV-1感染期间,中和血清型不受针对gp120单体中简单表位的抗体控制。在1213对血清和HIV-1分离株的组合中,有很大一部分(28%)导致血清依赖性感染性增强[负N(i)值],而不是中和作用。我们还注意到,负N(i)值往往与某些HIV-1分离株的相关性更好,而不是与HIV-1阳性血清的相关性更好。HIV-1的合胞体诱导变体比非合胞体诱导变体更有可能发生血清依赖性感染性增强,尽管后者变体显然也可能易受增强作用的影响。