• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连枷胸损伤的治疗:内固定与气管插管及通气治疗的比较

Management of flail chest injury: internal fixation versus endotracheal intubation and ventilation.

作者信息

Ahmed Z, Mohyuddin Z

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Dec;110(6):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70030-7.

DOI:10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70030-7
PMID:8523879
Abstract

A total of 427 patients with major chest trauma were treated in two major hospitals in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, during a 10-year period. In 64 of 426 patients, flail chest injury was the dominant factor among other injuries that were insignificant. Among 64 cases of flail chest injury, 25 were managed by internal fixation of ribs, whereas the remaining 38 were managed by endotracheal intubation and intermittent positive-pressure ventilation alone. Of the patients treated by internal fixation 80% (21/26) were weaned from the ventilator within an average of 1.3 days, whereas the remaining 20% (5/26) continued to need assisted ventilation for a longer duration; the total average duration of assisted ventilation for the whole group was 3.9 days. In comparison, among 38 patients with flail chest injury treated by endotracheal intubation and ventilation alone, the average duration of assisted ventilation was 15 days. In the group treated by internal fixation 11% (3/26) of the patients ultimately required a tracheotomy, whereas in the patients treated by intubation and ventilation alone tracheostomy was required in 37% (14/38) of the cases. In the group treated by internal fixation, chest infection was documented in 15% (4/26), septicemia in 4% (1/26), and barotrauma in 0%; in the other group these complications occurred in 50% (19/38), 24% (9/38), and 8% (3/38) of the cases, respectively. The mortality rate was 8% (2/26) in the surgically treated patients, whereas it was 29% (11/38) in the other group. All the deaths in both groups were ascribed to adult respiratory distress syndrome. Average stay in the intensive care unit was 9 days for the patients treated by internal fixation, whereas it was 21 days in the group treated by intubation and ventilation alone. The treatment of flail chest injury in our series by internal fixation resulted in speedy recovery, decreased complications, and better ultimate cosmetic and functional results and proved to be cost effective.

摘要

在10年期间,阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比的两家主要医院共收治了427例严重胸部创伤患者。在426例患者中,有64例连枷胸损伤是主要损伤因素,其他损伤不严重。在64例连枷胸损伤患者中,25例行肋骨内固定治疗,其余38例仅行气管插管和间歇正压通气治疗。接受内固定治疗的患者中,80%(21/26)平均在1.3天内脱机,其余20%(5/26)仍需较长时间的辅助通气;整个组的辅助通气总平均时长为3.9天。相比之下,在38例仅接受气管插管和通气治疗的连枷胸损伤患者中,辅助通气的平均时长为15天。接受内固定治疗的组中,11%(3/26)的患者最终需要气管切开,而仅接受插管和通气治疗的患者中,37%(14/38)的病例需要气管切开。接受内固定治疗的组中,有15%(4/26)记录有胸部感染,4%(1/26)有败血症,0%有气压伤;在另一组中,这些并发症分别发生在50%(19/38)、24%(9/38)和8%(3/38)的病例中。手术治疗患者的死亡率为8%(2/26),而另一组为29%(11/38)。两组所有死亡均归因于成人呼吸窘迫综合征。接受内固定治疗的患者在重症监护病房的平均住院时间为9天,而仅接受插管和通气治疗的组为21天。我们系列中连枷胸损伤采用内固定治疗可实现快速康复、减少并发症,并获得更好的最终美容和功能效果,且证明具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Management of flail chest injury: internal fixation versus endotracheal intubation and ventilation.连枷胸损伤的治疗:内固定与气管插管及通气治疗的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Dec;110(6):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70030-7.
2
Operative Treatment of Rib Fractures in Flail Chest Injuries: A Meta-analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.连枷胸损伤中肋骨骨折的手术治疗:一项荟萃分析和成本效益分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Feb;31(2):64-70. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000750.
3
Chest wall stabilization in ventilator-dependent traumatic flail chest patients: who benefits?依赖呼吸机的创伤性连枷胸患者的胸壁稳定术:谁能从中获益?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Apr 1;51(4):696-701. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw365.
4
Influence of flail chest on outcome among patients with severe thoracic cage trauma.连枷胸对严重胸廓创伤患者预后的影响。
Int Surg. 2002 Oct-Dec;87(4):240-4.
5
Surgical rib fixation for flail chest deformity improves liberation from mechanical ventilation.手术肋骨固定治疗连枷胸畸形可提高机械通气脱机成功率。
J Crit Care. 2014 Feb;29(1):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Flail chest injuries: a review of outcomes and treatment practices from the National Trauma Data Bank.连枷胸损伤:国家创伤数据库中结局和治疗实践的回顾。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):462-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000086.
7
Rib fracture fixation for flail chest: what is the benefit?连枷胸肋骨骨折固定:有何益处?
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Aug;215(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.02.023. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
[Surgical Stabilisation of Flail Chest Injury: Indications, Technique and Results].连枷胸损伤的手术稳定:适应证、技术及结果
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(4):303-7.
9
Pilot study of operative fixation of fractured ribs in patients with flail chest.连枷胸患者肋骨骨折手术固定的初步研究
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Nov;79(11):804-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05104.x.
10
[A contribution of multidetector computed tomography to indications for chest wall stabilisation in multiple rib fractures].[多层螺旋计算机断层扫描对多根肋骨骨折胸壁稳定指征的贡献]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(3):258-61.

引用本文的文献

1
A bi-institutional observational study comparing short-term and long-term outcome of operative and non-operative management of clinical and radiological flail chest injuries.一项双机构观察性研究,比较临床和影像学连枷胸损伤手术及非手术治疗的短期和长期结果。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 May 15;33(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01400-8.
2
An Early Presentation of Tricuspid Valve Rupture in a Trauma Patient With Congenital Heart Disease.先天性心脏病创伤患者三尖瓣破裂的早期表现
Case Rep Surg. 2025 Jan 30;2025:6711702. doi: 10.1155/cris/6711702. eCollection 2025.
3
Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper.
肋骨骨折的手术固定(SSRF):WSES 和 CWIS 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct 18;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00559-2.
4
Influence of Age on Outcome Following Rib Fractures - A Case-Control Analysis.年龄对肋骨骨折后预后的影响——一项病例对照分析
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024 Oct 2;15:21514593241280879. doi: 10.1177/21514593241280879. eCollection 2024.
5
A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing nonoperative and operative management of chest trauma with multiple rib fractures.一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析比较了多发肋骨骨折的非手术和手术治疗的随机对照试验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Mar 19;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00540-z.
6
Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures with Nonsurgical Management: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study.肋骨骨折手术固定与非手术治疗的院内结局比较:一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Inform Med. 2023;31(4):275-279. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.275-279.
7
Surgical Rib Fracture Fixation: Early Operative Intervention Improves Outcomes.手术肋骨骨折固定:早期手术干预可改善预后。
J Chest Surg. 2024 Mar 5;57(2):120-125. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.095. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
8
Improved Fixation Stability of a Dedicated Rib Fixation System in Flail Chest: A Retrospective Study.改良专用肋骨固定系统在连枷胸固定中的稳定性:一项回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 24;58(3):345. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030345.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination and History Taking in Traumatic Rib Fracture; A Single Center Experience.体格检查和病史采集对创伤性肋骨骨折的诊断准确性:单中心经验
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Apr;8(2):111-114. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.46451.
10
Association Between Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures and Mortality Rates Among US Trauma Centers.创伤性肋骨骨折患者治疗的循证实践依从性与美国创伤中心死亡率之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1316.