Suppr超能文献

胆囊切除术:小切口开腹手术与腹腔镜手术的比较

Cholecystectomy: comparison of minilaparotomy and laparoscopy.

作者信息

Mäkinen A M, Nordback I H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Tampere University, Finland.

出版信息

Int Surg. 1995 Apr-Jun;80(2):99-101.

PMID:8530244
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the most popular method of removing the gallbladder. Because it is an expensive operation requiring special training for the team, LC has been challenged by other methods of minimal-access surgery, e.g. by minilaparotomy (MC). This study was planned to be a single-surgeon prospective random study to compare minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but was never done over the pilot phase. Twenty-four cholecystectomies were included, eight MC and 16 LC, the patients being comparable between the groups. In the MC group three patients (37%) had complications versus no complications in the LC group (p = 0.028). Postoperative hospital stay was longer in the MC group (median three days) than in the LC group (median one day), even when the patients with complications were excluded. Due to these discouraging experiences the extended random study was never done, and MC was abandoned.

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已成为最常用的胆囊切除方法。由于该手术费用高昂,且团队需要接受特殊培训,因此LC受到了其他微创手术方法的挑战,例如小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)。本研究原计划是一项由单一外科医生进行的前瞻性随机研究,旨在比较小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),但在试验阶段就未能完成。共纳入24例胆囊切除术患者,其中8例行MC,16例行LC,两组患者具有可比性。MC组有3例患者(37%)出现并发症,而LC组无并发症(p = 0.028)。即使排除有并发症的患者,MC组的术后住院时间(中位数为3天)仍比LC组(中位数为1天)长。由于这些令人沮丧的经验,扩展随机研究从未进行,MC也被放弃了。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验