Mäkinen A M, Nordback I H
Department of Clinical Medicine, Tampere University, Finland.
Int Surg. 1995 Apr-Jun;80(2):99-101.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the most popular method of removing the gallbladder. Because it is an expensive operation requiring special training for the team, LC has been challenged by other methods of minimal-access surgery, e.g. by minilaparotomy (MC). This study was planned to be a single-surgeon prospective random study to compare minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but was never done over the pilot phase. Twenty-four cholecystectomies were included, eight MC and 16 LC, the patients being comparable between the groups. In the MC group three patients (37%) had complications versus no complications in the LC group (p = 0.028). Postoperative hospital stay was longer in the MC group (median three days) than in the LC group (median one day), even when the patients with complications were excluded. Due to these discouraging experiences the extended random study was never done, and MC was abandoned.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已成为最常用的胆囊切除方法。由于该手术费用高昂,且团队需要接受特殊培训,因此LC受到了其他微创手术方法的挑战,例如小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)。本研究原计划是一项由单一外科医生进行的前瞻性随机研究,旨在比较小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),但在试验阶段就未能完成。共纳入24例胆囊切除术患者,其中8例行MC,16例行LC,两组患者具有可比性。MC组有3例患者(37%)出现并发症,而LC组无并发症(p = 0.028)。即使排除有并发症的患者,MC组的术后住院时间(中位数为3天)仍比LC组(中位数为1天)长。由于这些令人沮丧的经验,扩展随机研究从未进行,MC也被放弃了。