• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术。并发症分析]

[Cholecystectomy with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Analysis of the complications].

作者信息

Beltramo M, Benussi G, Cazzaniga M, Fraquelli M

机构信息

Divisione di Chirurgia, Ospedale di Carate Brianza, Milano.

出版信息

Minerva Chir. 1995 Jul-Aug;50(7-8):627-31.

PMID:8532194
Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been adopted by many as the treatment of choice for uncomplicated biliary lithiasis; since an increasing number of surgeons use LC even in complicated cases, we examined our series in order to see if this is the correct procedure. We report on the results of our first 252 LC and compare them with our latest 66 open cholecystectomies, in order to evaluate number and importance of postoperative complications. Besides we compare complications in patients below and over 60 years of age to verify if age bears any significance. We found no difference in frequency of complications among patients younger or older than 60; highly significant is, on the contrary, the difference in complications between the two procedures, the incidence being much lower in the laparoscopic one. We state that LC is a safe and effective procedure and suggest it as the method of choice for the treatment of any symptomatic gallbladder stone disease.

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)已被许多人采用,作为治疗单纯性胆石症的首选方法;由于越来越多的外科医生甚至在复杂病例中也使用LC,我们对我们的病例系列进行了检查,以确定这是否是正确的手术方式。我们报告了我们最初的252例LC的结果,并将其与我们最近的66例开腹胆囊切除术进行比较,以评估术后并发症的数量和重要性。此外,我们比较了60岁以下和60岁以上患者的并发症情况,以验证年龄是否有任何意义。我们发现60岁以下和60岁以上患者的并发症发生率没有差异;相反,两种手术方式在并发症方面的差异非常显著,腹腔镜手术的发生率要低得多。我们认为LC是一种安全有效的手术方式,并建议将其作为治疗任何有症状胆囊结石疾病的首选方法。

相似文献

1
[Cholecystectomy with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Analysis of the complications].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术。并发症分析]
Minerva Chir. 1995 Jul-Aug;50(7-8):627-31.
2
A comparison of serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy.开腹胆囊切除术或腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗患者血清白细胞介素-6浓度的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(60):1595-9.
3
Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older.65岁及以上患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术对比
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Jun;8(3):208-10.
4
The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the management and outcome of biliary tract disease in North Carolina: a statewide, population-based, time-series analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术对北卡罗来纳州胆道疾病治疗及预后的影响:一项基于全州人口的时间序列分析
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):31-45.
5
A prospective review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Brunei.文莱腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Apr;8(2):120-2.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients.肥胖患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Obes Surg. 2005 Feb;15(2):243-6. doi: 10.1381/0960892053268516.
7
Prospective analysis of 192 consecutive cholecystectomies: a comparative study between laparoscopy and laparotomy.192例连续胆囊切除术的前瞻性分析:腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的对比研究
Acta Chir Belg. 1995 Nov-Dec;95(6):254-60.
8
Cholecystectomy: comparison of minilaparotomy and laparoscopy.胆囊切除术:小切口开腹手术与腹腔镜手术的比较
Int Surg. 1995 Apr-Jun;80(2):99-101.
9
Complications of cholecystectomy in the era of laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术时代胆囊切除术的并发症
Trop Gastroenterol. 2001 Apr-Jun;22(2):72-9.
10
Comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at Prince Abdulrahman Al Sudairy Hospital, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·苏戴里王子医院腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的比较。
East Afr Med J. 1998 Sep;75(9):536-9.