Parsonnet J, Modern P A, Giacobbe K D
Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA.
J Infect Dis. 1996 Jan;173(1):98-103. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.1.98.
To determine whether tampons composed of cotton or rayon differ in their effects on production of TSST-1 in vitro, two methods of bacterial cultivation, with and without agitation, were used to study the effects of 16 commercially available and experimental tampons on production of TSST-1. Experiments were done in blinded fashion. TSST-1 was produced in medium alone in the absence of a tampon by both methods. Neither cotton nor rayon tampons consistently increased toxin production, nor were there significant differences between them in their effects on TSST-1. In contrast, a tampon composed of carboxymethylcellulose and polyester foam increased production of TSST-1 to a large degree in both culture systems. Thus, neither cotton nor rayon amplifies production of TSST-1 in vitro, and cotton tampons cannot be claimed to be inherently safer on the basis of such data.
为了确定由棉或人造丝制成的卫生棉条对体外TSST-1产生的影响是否存在差异,采用了两种细菌培养方法(有搅拌和无搅拌)来研究16种市售和实验性卫生棉条对TSST-1产生的影响。实验采用盲法进行。两种方法在无卫生棉条的培养基中单独培养时均产生TSST-1。棉和人造丝卫生棉条均未持续增加毒素产生,它们对TSST-1的影响也无显著差异。相比之下,由羧甲基纤维素和聚酯泡沫组成的卫生棉条在两种培养系统中均使TSST-1的产生大幅增加。因此,棉和人造丝在体外均不会放大TSST-1的产生,基于此类数据不能声称棉卫生棉条本质上更安全。