• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[挪威的科研不端行为与医学研究]

[Scientific misconduct and medical research in Norway].

作者信息

Bekkelund S I, Hegstad A C, Førde O H

机构信息

Nevrologisk avdeling Regionsykehuset i Tromsø.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Oct 20;115(25):3148-51.

PMID:8539699
Abstract

To evaluate the occurrence of scientific misconduct in medical research in Norway, 274 randomly selected Norwegian scientists were asked to complete a questionnaire on their knowledge and experience of deviations from the Medical Research Council's professional standard. Altogether 215 (80%) completed the questionnaire. Knowledge of severe misconduct was reported by 22% while 3% reported occurrence of falsification or fabrication of data within their own research group. Ten percent of the respondents knew of plagiarism, while 58% confirmed experience of less severe misconduct, most frequently misleading authorship. Nine percent had themselves contributed to one or more incidents of misconduct. Occurrence of misconduct was not related to area of research. The gap between admitting own misconduct and knowledge of misconduct by others was striking. According to 54% of the respondents, organized ethical education for young scientists would be an effective way of preventing misconduct. Altogether, the present data show that efforts are needed to prevent misconduct in medical research.

摘要

为评估挪威医学研究中科研不端行为的发生情况,274名随机挑选的挪威科学家被要求填写一份关于他们对偏离医学研究委员会专业标准的了解和经历的调查问卷。共有215人(80%)完成了问卷。22%的人报告了解严重的不端行为,而3%的人报告在他们自己的研究团队中发生过数据造假或伪造。10%的受访者知晓剽窃行为,而58%的人证实有较轻不端行为的经历,最常见的是误导性署名。9%的人自己曾参与一起或多起不端事件。不端行为的发生与研究领域无关。承认自己的不端行为与知晓他人的不端行为之间的差距令人震惊。54%的受访者认为,为年轻科学家开展有组织的伦理教育是预防不端行为的有效途径。总体而言,目前的数据表明,需要努力预防医学研究中的不端行为。

相似文献

1
[Scientific misconduct and medical research in Norway].[挪威的科研不端行为与医学研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Oct 20;115(25):3148-51.
2
[Misconduct in medical research. A questionnaire survey among project leaders in health region 4].[医学研究中的不当行为。对第四健康区域项目负责人的问卷调查]
Nord Med. 1994;109(3):85-8.
3
[Dishonesty in medical research. A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4].[医学研究中的不诚实行为。对第四健康区域项目管理人员的问卷调查研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Oct 20;113(25):3149-52.
4
[Medical research and the ethics committee. A questionnaire study among project leaders in the health region 4].[医学研究与伦理委员会。对第4健康区项目负责人的问卷调查研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Dec 10;114(30):3650-4.
5
Scientific dishonesty--questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden.科学不端行为——对瑞典博士生的问卷调查。
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):315-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033654. Epub 2010 May 3.
6
Scientific Dishonesty: A Survey of Doctoral Students at the Major Medical Faculties in Sweden and Norway.学术不诚实:对瑞典和挪威主要医学院校博士生的一项调查。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Oct;10(4):380-8. doi: 10.1177/1556264615599686. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
7
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?科学署名。第一部分。洞察科学欺诈的窗口?
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003.
8
Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.克罗地亚科学界的研究不端行为:一项评估研究不端行为形式与特征的调查
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):165-181. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
9
Ethical dilemmas and solutions for risk assessment scientists.
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1992 Oct-Dec;2(4):381-9.
10
The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.科学研究的伦理:对科学家和机构代表焦点小组的分析
J Investig Med. 1997 Aug;45(6):371-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific dishonesty--a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway.科学不端行为——挪威博士生全国调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jan 5;14:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-3.
2
Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.培养研究中的诚信:定义、现有知识及未来方向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/pl00022268.
3
Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin).
国际研究伦理准则的制定:对《科学不端行为:当前问题与未来趋势》(B. 米什金)的评论
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):293-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0021-x.
4
Sociology and psychology within the scope of scientific dishonesty.科学不端行为范畴内的社会学与心理学。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0020-4.