Lancet. 1995;346(8991-8992):1647-53.
Individual studies of stroke have not clearly answered two questions: on the relation, if any, between total blood cholesterol and stroke; and on how the strength of the relation between diastolic blood pressure and stroke varies with age. The associations of blood cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure with subsequent stroke rates were investigated by review of 45 prospective observational cohorts involving 450,000 individuals with 5-30 years of follow-up (mean 16 years, total 7.3 million person-years of observation), during which 13,397 participants were recorded as having had a stroke. Most of these were fatal strokes in studies that recorded only mortality and not incidence, but about one-quarter were from studies that recorded both fatal and non-fatal strokes. After standardization for age, there was no association between blood cholesterol and stroke except, perhaps, in those under 45 years of age when screened. This lack of association was not influenced by adjustment for sex, diastolic blood pressure, history of coronary disease, or ethnicity (Asian or non-Asian). However, because the types of the strokes were not centrally available, the lack of any overall relation might conceal a positive association with ischaemic stroke together with a negative association with haemorrhagic stroke. When the highest and the lowest of the six blood pressure categories were compared, the difference in usual diastolic blood pressure was 27 mm Hg (102 vs 75 mm Hg), and there was a fivefold difference in stroke risk. This fivefold difference was seen both in those with a pre-existing history of coronary heart disease and in those without it. The proportional difference in stroke risk, however, was more extreme in middle than in old age. Among those aged < 45, 45-64, and 65+ when screened, the differences in the relative risks of stroke (between the highest diastolic blood pressure category and a combination of the lowest two categories) were tenfold, fivefold, and twofold, respectively. However, because the absolute stroke risks are greater in old age, the absolute differences in the annual stroke rates showed an opposite pattern, being 2, 5, and 8 per thousand, respectively. This suggests that the effects of therapeutic blood pressure reductions should be assessed separately in middle age and in old age.
总血胆固醇与中风之间是否存在关系(若存在,是何种关系);舒张压与中风之间关系的强度如何随年龄变化。通过对45个前瞻性观察队列进行回顾,研究了血胆固醇和舒张压与后续中风发生率之间的关联。这些队列涉及45万人,随访时间为5至30年(平均16年,总计730万人年的观察期),在此期间,有13397名参与者被记录发生了中风。在仅记录死亡率而非发病率的研究中,大多数中风是致命性的,但约四分之一来自既记录致命性中风又记录非致命性中风的研究。在对年龄进行标准化后,血胆固醇与中风之间没有关联,可能除了筛查时年龄在45岁以下的人群。这种缺乏关联不受性别、舒张压、冠心病史或种族(亚洲或非亚洲)调整的影响。然而,由于中风类型并非集中可得,缺乏任何总体关系可能掩盖了与缺血性中风的正相关以及与出血性中风的负相关。当比较六个血压类别中的最高值和最低值时,通常舒张压的差异为27毫米汞柱(102对75毫米汞柱),中风风险存在五倍差异。在有冠心病既往史的人群和无冠心病既往史的人群中均观察到这种五倍差异。然而,中风风险的比例差异在中年人群中比在老年人群中更为显著。在筛查时年龄小于45岁、45至64岁和65岁及以上的人群中,中风相对风险(最高舒张压类别与最低两个类别组合之间)的差异分别为十倍、五倍和两倍。然而,由于老年人群的绝对中风风险更高,年中风率的绝对差异呈现相反模式,分别为千分之二、千分之五和千分之八。这表明应分别在中年和老年人群中评估治疗性降低血压的效果。