Mukhopadhyay A K, Garg S, Nair G B, Kar S, Ghosh R K, Pajni S, Ghosh A, Shimada T, Takeda T, Takeda Y
Department of Microbiology, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Beliaghata, Calcutta, India.
Epidemiol Infect. 1995 Dec;115(3):427-34. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800058581.
Sixty-nine strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 isolated at different times were analysed to investigate if there were any differences among the O1 strains isolated before, during and after the advent of the O139 serogroup. Of the 69 O1 strains examined, 68 belonged to the Ogawa serotype while one belonged to the Inaba serotype. With the exception of one strain all other strains of V. cholerae O1 belonged to the eltor biotype. A single O1 strain isolated before the emergence of the O139 serogroup could not be classified as either eltor or classical biotype because it was resistant to both classical and eltor specific bacteriophages. Marked variations in the susceptibility to antibiotics of V. cholerae O1 isolated during the different periods were observed. In addition, strains of V. cholerae isolated after the epidemic of serogroup O139 in Calcutta showed an expanding R-type with resistance to a variety of drugs as compared to the O1 strains isolated before the advent of the O139 serogroup. From this study, it is clear that there is a substantial mobility in genetic elements of V. cholerae O1 which necessitates a continuous monitoring to keep abreast of the changing traits of the etiologic agent of cholera.
对不同时期分离出的69株霍乱弧菌O1进行分析,以调查在O139血清群出现之前、期间和之后分离出的O1菌株之间是否存在差异。在检测的69株O1菌株中,68株属于小川血清型,1株属于稻叶血清型。除1株外,所有其他霍乱弧菌O1菌株均属于埃尔托生物型。在O139血清群出现之前分离出的1株O1菌株无法归类为埃尔托或古典生物型,因为它对古典和埃尔托特异性噬菌体均具有抗性。观察到不同时期分离出的霍乱弧菌O1对抗生素的敏感性存在明显差异。此外,与O139血清群出现之前分离出的O1菌株相比,在加尔各答O139血清群疫情之后分离出的霍乱弧菌菌株显示出对多种药物具有抗性的R型不断扩大。从这项研究可以清楚地看出,霍乱弧菌O1的遗传元件具有很大的流动性,因此有必要持续监测,以跟上霍乱病原体不断变化的特征。