Katigbak M S, Church A T, Akamine T X
Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-2136, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jan;70(1):99-114. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.1.99.
The cross-cultural generalizability of personality dimensions was investigated by (a) identifying indigenous Philippine dimensions, (b) testing the cross-cultural replicability of the NEO 5-factor model (P. T. Costa & R.R. McCrae, 1992), and (c) relating Philippine and Western dimensions in Philippine and U.S. samples of college students. Filipino self-ratings (N = 536) on indigenous items were factor analyzed, and 6 Philippine dimensions were obtained. Conclusions about the replicability of the 5-factor model in the Philippines (N = 432) depended on whether exploratory, Procrustes, or confirmatory factor methods were used. In regression and joint factor analyses, moderate to strong associations were found between the Philippine dimensions and (a) dimensions from the 5-factor model in both Philippine (N = 387) and U.S. (N = 610) samples, and (b) the Tellegen model (A. Tellegen, 1985; A. Tellegen & N.G. Waller, in press) in a U.S. sample (N = 603).
(a) 确定菲律宾本土维度；(b) 检验NEO五因素模型（P.T. 科斯塔和R.R. 麦克雷，1992年）的跨文化可重复性；(c) 在菲律宾和美国大学生样本中关联菲律宾维度和西方维度。对菲律宾本土项目上的菲律宾人自评（N = 536）进行了因素分析，得到了6个菲律宾维度。关于五因素模型在菲律宾（N = 432）的可重复性的结论取决于使用的是探索性、普罗克汝斯忒斯还是验证性因素方法。在回归分析和联合因素分析中，在菲律宾（N = 387）和美国（N = 610）样本中，菲律宾维度与(a) 五因素模型中的维度，以及(b) 在美国样本（N = 603）中的特根模型（A. 特根，1985年；A. 特根和N.G. 沃勒，即将发表）之间发现了中度到高度的关联。
