Sorenson S B, Upchurch D M, Shen H
School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, 90095-1772, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jan;86(1):35-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.1.35.
Community-based research on violence against women typically focuses on marital arguments rather than on resulting injuries. This study investigated patterns of victimization, violence perpetration, and injury in marital arguments.
Data from the National Survey on Families and Households and binomial and multinomial logit models were used to analyze characteristics of those who experienced physical violence, as well as to determine who was the perpetrator and who was the victim.
Men and women reported similar behaviors during verbal arguments. Young persons, urban dwellers, the less educated, those with low incomes, and Blacks were more likely to report that there had been physical violence in their marriages in the past year. Ethnicity, income, education, and number and age of children at home were not associated consistently with injury of the wife, the husband, or both.
Persons who report physical violence in their marriage are very similar to those who are at increased risk of interpersonal violence in general. The co-occurrence of street and other nonfamily violence with spousal violence may be a fruitful area for future research.
基于社区的针对妇女暴力行为的研究通常聚焦于婚姻争吵而非由此导致的伤害。本研究调查了婚姻争吵中的受害模式、暴力行为实施情况以及伤害情况。
使用来自全国家庭调查的数据以及二项式和多项逻辑回归模型,来分析经历身体暴力者的特征,以及确定谁是施暴者、谁是受害者。
男性和女性在言语争吵中报告的行为相似。年轻人、城市居民、受教育程度较低者、低收入者以及黑人更有可能报告在过去一年里他们的婚姻中存在身体暴力。种族、收入、教育程度以及家中孩子的数量和年龄与妻子、丈夫或双方的受伤情况并无一致关联。
报告婚姻中存在身体暴力的人与那些总体上面临人际暴力风险增加的人非常相似。街头暴力和其他非家庭暴力与配偶暴力的共同发生可能是未来研究的一个富有成果的领域。