Clooney F X
Theology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167-3806, USA.
J Med Philos. 1995 Aug;20(4):439-57. doi: 10.1093/jmp/20.4.439.
Instead of searching through Hindu sources for appropriate insights into the questions related to "playing God" in biomedicine, the author seeks rather to understand why some Hindus at least are not inclined to ask such questions. Using examples from the Srĩvaisnava sect of south India, the author shows how Srĩvaisnava Hindus focus primarily on character formation and the practice of the virtues encoded in the classical texts, thereafter leaving it to the individual to "act as he or she will" in the world outside the community-a world which is neutral vis à vis religious values, neither governed by such values nor able to instigate the adjustment of religious values to fit changing times. The question then becomes, "What do modern ethicists have to learn from the moral discourse of the Srĩvaisnava community."
作者并非在印度教资料中探寻有关生物医学中“扮演上帝”问题的恰当见解,而是试图理解为何至少一些印度教徒不倾向于提出此类问题。作者以南印度的室利毗湿奴派为例,展示了该派印度教徒如何主要专注于品格塑造以及践行经典文本中所蕴含的美德,此后让个人在社群之外的世界“随心所欲地行动”——这个世界相对于宗教价值观是中立的,既不受这些价值观支配,也无法促使宗教价值观进行调整以适应时代变化。那么问题就变成了:“现代伦理学家能从室利毗湿奴派社群的道德论述中学到什么?”