Kuffer M, Schunck B, Hartmann K, Kraft W
I. Medizinischen Tierklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
Tierarztl Prax. 1995 Aug;23(4):415-7.
In this study 52 canine fecal samples were examined for the presence of canine parvovirus (CPV). The two different test systems used to confirm infection were electron microscopy as standard method and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In comparison, the results conferred in 92.3%. The CPV ELISA had a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 100%. Therefore, it can be used as a quick, reliable method for diagnosis of canine parvovirus infection in veterinary practice.
在本研究中，对52份犬粪便样本进行了犬细小病毒（CPV）检测。用于确认感染的两种不同检测系统分别是作为标准方法的电子显微镜检查和酶联免疫吸附测定（ELISA）。相比之下，两者结果的一致性为92.3%。CPV ELISA的灵敏度为89.7%，特异性为100%。因此，它可作为兽医实践中诊断犬细小病毒感染的一种快速、可靠的方法。
