Leach I H, Blundell J W, Rowley J M, Turner D R
Department of Histopathology, University Hospital, Nottingham, U.K.
Eur Heart J. 1995 Sep;16(9):1181-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061073.
The frequency of acute coronary artery thrombus and myocardial infarction in subjects dying suddenly or unexpectedly from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is still unclear, with previous autopsy studies reporting an incidence between 4% and 100%. In this study of 333 randomly selected out-of-hospital deaths, detailed autopsy showed IHD as the sole cause of death in 206 (62%). One hundred and seventeen acute coronary thrombi were present in 96 cases whilst four had an established acute infarct without an identifiable coronary thrombus. Thus 100 (48.5%) IHD deaths had evidence of an acute ischaemic lesion. Acute lesions were equally prevalent among males and females, but the incidence declined with increasing age and they were less frequent among those with a prior clinical history of heart disease. One hundred and forty-seven IHD deaths were witnessed. The proportion of cases with an acute ischaemic lesion increased with the duration of pre-morbid symptoms. Of those with an acute lesion, only 17% died without symptoms compared to 63% of those without an acute lesion. All cases with symptoms lasting more than 3.5 h had an acute lesion. Overall, almost half out-of-hospital IHD deaths in this study were related to an acute ischaemic lesion. Differences in the detail of the pathological examination and examination of differing sub-groups of the out-of-hospital death population probably account for the differing results of previous studies.
因缺血性心脏病(IHD)突然或意外死亡的患者中急性冠状动脉血栓形成和心肌梗死的发生率仍不明确,以往尸检研究报告的发生率在4%至100%之间。在这项对333例随机选择的院外死亡病例的研究中,详细尸检显示IHD是206例(62%)患者的唯一死因。96例患者存在117个急性冠状动脉血栓,4例有明确的急性梗死但未发现冠状动脉血栓。因此,100例(48.5%)IHD死亡病例有急性缺血性病变的证据。急性病变在男性和女性中同样常见,但发病率随年龄增长而下降,在有心脏病既往临床病史的患者中发病率较低。147例IHD死亡病例有目击者。急性缺血性病变病例的比例随病前症状持续时间增加。在有急性病变的患者中,只有17%无症状死亡,而无急性病变的患者中这一比例为%。所有症状持续超过3.5小时的病例都有急性病变。总体而言,本研究中近一半的院外IHD死亡与急性缺血性病变有关。病理检查细节以及院外死亡人群不同亚组检查的差异可能是以往研究结果不同的原因。