Colasanti G, Arrigo G, Santoro A, Mandolfo S, Tetta C, Bucci R, Spongano M, Imbasciati E, Rizza V, Cianciavicchia D
Department of Nephrology, Ospedale San Carlo, Milano, Italy.
Int J Artif Organs. 1995 Sep;18(9):544-7.
We tested a new biosensor for urea monitoring in the ultrafiltrate during PFD in a group of 5 hemodialyzed stable patients. The inspection of the UF-urea profile reflects the dynamical changes of the plasma urea concentration during diffusive dialysis and allows the fitting of the main mathematical models of urea kinetics. The biosensor efficiency was 98.4% on average (SD: 1.5%) at Uf fluxes varying from 45 to 55 ml/min (mean: 51 ml/min; SD: 3.2) and at Uf-urea concentrations varying from 23 to 165 mg/dl. The mean difference between Uf-urea determined by the laboratory method and Uf-urea assayed by the biosensor was -1.07 mg/dl and the 95% confidence interval ranged from -2.01 to 0.13 mg/dl. The mean difference between laboratory plasma urea and Uf-urea from the biosensor was on average -1.9 mg/dl and the estimated limits of agreement with a confidence of 95% were -3.16 and 0.64 mg/dl. Comparison between kinetic models and experimental profiles of plasma urea decrease, evaluations of recirculation and post-dialytic rebound, the role of Kt/V on-line during dialysis were the preliminary clinical applications of this biosensor.
我们在一组5名血液透析稳定的患者中测试了一种用于在持续性低效透析(PFD)期间监测超滤液中尿素的新型生物传感器。对超滤尿素曲线的检查反映了扩散透析期间血浆尿素浓度的动态变化,并允许对尿素动力学的主要数学模型进行拟合。在超滤通量从45至55毫升/分钟(平均:51毫升/分钟;标准差:3.2)以及超滤尿素浓度从23至165毫克/分升变化时,生物传感器的效率平均为98.4%(标准差:1.5%)。通过实验室方法测定的超滤尿素与通过生物传感器测定的超滤尿素之间的平均差异为-1.07毫克/分升,95%置信区间为-2.01至0.13毫克/分升。实验室血浆尿素与生物传感器的超滤尿素之间的平均差异平均为-1.9毫克/分升,95%置信度下的估计一致性界限为-3.16和0.64毫克/分升。血浆尿素降低的动力学模型与实验曲线之间的比较、再循环和透析后反跳的评估、透析期间Kt/V的在线作用是该生物传感器的初步临床应用。