• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多变量最优判别分析在内科医学中的应用。

Application of multivariable optimal discriminant analysis in general internal medicine.

作者信息

Yarnold P R, Soltysik R C, McCormick W C, Burns R, Lin E H, Bush T, Martin G J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Nov;10(11):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02602743.

DOI:10.1007/BF02602743
PMID:8583262
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the use of multivariable optimal discriminant analysis (MultiODA).

DESIGN

Data from four previously published studies were reanalyzed using MultiODA. The original analysis was Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) for two studies and logistic regression analysis (LRA) for two studies.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In Study 1, FLDA achieved an overall percentage accuracy in classification (PAC) for the training sample of 69.9%, compared with 73.5% for MultiODA. In Study 2, the LRA model required three attributes to achieve a 76.1% overall PAC for the training sample and a 79.4% overall PAC for the hold-out sample. Using only two attributes, the MultiODA model achieved similar values. In Study 3, the FLDA model achieved an overall PAC of 82.5%, compared with 87.5% for the MultiODA model. In Study 4, MultiODA identified a two-attribute model that achieved a 93.3% overall training PAC, when an LRA model could not be developed.

CONCLUSIONS

MultiODA identified: a superior training model (Study 1); a more parsimonious model that achieved superior overall training and identical hold-out PAC (Study 2); a model that achieved a higher hold-out PAC (Study 3); and a two-attribute model that achieved a relatively high PAC when a multivariable LRA model could not be obtained (Study 4). These findings suggest that MultiODA has the potential to improve the accuracy of predictions made in general internal medicine research.

摘要

目的

阐述多变量最优判别分析(MultiODA)的应用。

设计

使用MultiODA对四项先前发表的研究数据进行重新分析。其中两项研究的原始分析方法是费舍尔线性判别分析(FLDA),另外两项研究的原始分析方法是逻辑回归分析(LRA)。

测量指标及主要结果

在研究1中,FLDA对训练样本的分类总体准确率(PAC)为69.9%,而MultiODA为73.5%。在研究2中,LRA模型需要三个属性才能使训练样本的总体PAC达到76.1%,留出样本的总体PAC达到79.4%。仅使用两个属性时,MultiODA模型就能达到类似的值。在研究3中,FLDA模型的总体PAC为82.5%,而MultiODA模型为87.5%。在研究4中,当无法建立LRA模型时,MultiODA识别出一个双属性模型,其训练样本的总体PAC达到了93.3%。

结论

MultiODA识别出:一个更优的训练模型(研究1);一个更简洁的模型,该模型在总体训练中表现更优且留出样本的PAC相同(研究2);一个留出样本PAC更高的模型(研究3);以及一个在无法获得多变量LRA模型时能达到相对较高PAC的双属性模型(研究4)。这些发现表明,MultiODA有潜力提高普通内科研究中预测的准确性。

相似文献

1
Application of multivariable optimal discriminant analysis in general internal medicine.多变量最优判别分析在内科医学中的应用。
J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Nov;10(11):601-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02602743.
2
Heart rate variability and susceptibility for sudden cardiac death: an example of multivariable optimal discriminant analysis.心率变异性与心源性猝死易感性:多变量最优判别分析实例
Stat Med. 1994 May 30;13(10):1015-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131004.
3
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation: unit-weighted MultiODA for binary data.预测接受心肺复苏患者的院内死亡率:用于二元数据的单位加权多重有序判别分析(MultiODA)
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 30;17(20):2405-14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981030)17:20<2405::aid-sim928>3.0.co;2-f.
4
Identifying offline muscle strength profiles sufficient for short-duration FES-LCE exercise: a PAC learning model approach.识别足以进行短时间功能性电刺激辅助站立和移动运动的离线肌肉力量概况:一种 PAC 学习模型方法。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2006 Jun;20(3):209-20. doi: 10.1007/s10877-006-9023-2. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
5
Delirium During Postacute Nursing Home Admission and Risk for Adverse Outcomes.急性后期疗养院入院期间的谵妄及不良后果风险
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jul;65(7):1470-1475. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14823. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Risk factors for general medicine readmissions and association with mortality.普通内科再入院的危险因素及其与死亡率的关联。
N Z Med J. 2014 May 23;127(1394):42-50.
7
Pediatric Hospital Discharges to Home Health and Postacute Facility Care: A National Study.儿科医院出院至家庭健康和后期医疗机构护理:一项全国性研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Apr;170(4):326-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4836.
8
Use of Post-Acute Facility Care in Children Hospitalized With Acute Respiratory Illness.急性呼吸道疾病住院儿童的急性后期设施护理的使用情况
J Hosp Med. 2017 Aug;12(8):626-631. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2780.
9
Description of PICU Unplanned Readmission.儿科重症监护病房非计划再入院的描述。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):558-62. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000735.
10
Predictive model of readmission to internal medicine wards.内科病房再入院预测模型。
Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jul;23(5):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Mathematical Programming Approaches for the Classification Problem in Two-Group Discriminant Analysis.两组判别分析中分类问题的数学规划方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Oct 1;25(4):427-54. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_2.
2
Heart rate variability and susceptibility for sudden cardiac death: an example of multivariable optimal discriminant analysis.心率变异性与心源性猝死易感性:多变量最优判别分析实例
Stat Med. 1994 May 30;13(10):1015-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131004.
3
Frustrating patients: physician and patient perspectives among distressed high users of medical services.
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 May-Jun;6(3):241-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02598969.
4
Long-term care needs of hospitalized persons with AIDS: a prospective cohort study.艾滋病住院患者的长期护理需求:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02599386.
5
Long-term care preferences of hospitalized persons with AIDS.艾滋病住院患者的长期护理偏好
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(6):524-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02598221.
6
Factors predicting readmission of older general medicine patients.预测老年普通内科患者再入院的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):389-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02598158.