Romero C, Pardo M, Grillo M J, Diaz R, Blasco J M, Lopez-Goñi I
Departamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Dec;33(12):3198-200. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3198-3200.1995.
A study was performed to evaluate the previously described PCR (C. Romero, C. Gamazo, M. Pardo, and I. López-Goñi, J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:615-617, 1995) for the diagnosis of brucellosis in dairy cattle. Milk samples from 56 Brucella milk culture-positive cattle and from 37 cattle from Brucella-free herds were examined for Brucella DNA by PCR and for specific antibodies by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The specificities of both tests were 100% when testing the milk samples from Brucella-free cattle. The milk samples from 49 infected cattle were positive by PCR (87.5% sensitivity), and 55 were positive by ELISA (98.2% sensitivity). A PCR-positive sample was negative by ELISA, and 7 ELISA-positive samples were PCR negative, yielding an observed proportion of agreement of 0.91 for the two tests. Although the results suggest that ELISA is a better screening test than PCR, the combined sensitivity of the two assays was 100%, and their simultaneous application could be more useful than one test alone for a rapid screening of brucellosis in dairy cattle.
进行了一项研究,以评估先前描述的聚合酶链反应(C. 罗梅罗、C. 加马佐、M. 帕尔多和I. 洛佩斯 - 戈尼,《临床微生物学杂志》33:615 - 617,1995年)用于诊断奶牛布鲁氏菌病的效果。通过聚合酶链反应检测了来自56头布鲁氏菌乳汁培养阳性奶牛以及来自37头无布鲁氏菌牛群的奶牛的乳汁样本中的布鲁氏菌DNA,并通过间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测了特异性抗体。在检测无布鲁氏菌奶牛的乳汁样本时,两种检测方法的特异性均为100%。49头感染奶牛的乳汁样本通过聚合酶链反应呈阳性(敏感性为87.5%),55份样本通过ELISA呈阳性(敏感性为98.2%)。一份聚合酶链反应阳性的样本通过ELISA检测为阴性,7份ELISA阳性样本聚合酶链反应为阴性,两种检测方法的观察一致性比例为0.91。尽管结果表明ELISA作为筛查检测方法比聚合酶链反应更好,但两种检测方法的联合敏感性为100%,同时应用这两种检测方法可能比单独使用一种检测方法在快速筛查奶牛布鲁氏菌病方面更有用。