Fiocchi A, Restani P, Riva E, Qualizza R, Bruni P, Restelli A R, Galli C L
5th Pediatric Department, Institute of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Italy.
J Am Coll Nutr. 1995 Jun;14(3):239-44. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1995.10718502.
The use of lamb meat products has been suggested as an alternative diet for polyallergic children, although until now this clinical practice has not been supported by in-depth biochemical/immunological studies. The aims of this research were: to evaluate cross-reactivity between lamb and beef; to evaluate the role of BSA and OSA as allergens in beef allergic children; and to evaluate cross-reactivity between BSA and OSA.
16 children suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD), aged 12 months-8 8 years (mean age 2.61 +/- 1.93 years) were found skin prick test (SPT)--positive to bovine meat; all of them were also SPT-positive to ovine meat and to milk. After a period of restricted diet, the selected 16 children were recalled; 12 AD-free children (8 males and 14 females, aged 12 months-4.33 years (mean age 2.21 +/- 1.05 years) were evaluated by SPT and radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for the following allergens: bovine meat, ovine meat, BSA 1 mg/ml, OSA 1 mg/ml. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and ovine serum albumin (OSA) were performed. For SPT, the results were expressed in mm of wheal, and 3 mm was considered as the end point; correlation between wheal diameters was calculated by Spearman rank test. For DBPCFC, according to the Sampson's experimental procedure, BSA and OSA were given in pear juice (the dermal negative response to the pear juice was verified by fresh food SPT before starting the oral challenge test). The total dose administered to the children corresponded to the amount of albumin present in 180 g of calf or lamb meat (90 and 63 mg respectively, as calculated by Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SPS-PAGE). The administration of pear juice (containing placebo or albumin) and symptom evaluation were entrusted to medical people who did not know what the child received.
All children tested SPT positive to bovine and ovine meat, and to BSA and OSA. Significant correlations were observed between the following diameters of wheal: BSA vs OSA (R = 0.846, p < 0.0001); ovine meat vs OSA (R = 0.769, p < 0.005); b.meat vs o.meat (R = 0.771, p < 0.005); and ovine meat vs BSA (R = 0.594, p < 0.043). In RAST, 6 of 12 children were positive to bovine meat, 3 to lamb meat, 4 to BSA and 3 to OSA. DBPCFC showed an immediate reaction to BSA or OSA in 2 and 3 children, respectively. One other child developed severe dyspnea, cough and asthma 3 hours after OSA challenge.
BSA and OSA are important beef and lamb allergens; they share not only proteic sequences, but also allergenic properties. Clinical tolerance to BSA and OSA can be present in beef and lamb SPT-positive children.
有人建议将羊肉制品作为多过敏儿童的替代饮食,尽管迄今为止这种临床实践尚未得到深入的生化/免疫学研究的支持。本研究的目的是:评估羊肉和牛肉之间的交叉反应性;评估牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和羊血清白蛋白(OSA)作为牛肉过敏儿童过敏原的作用;以及评估BSA和OSA之间的交叉反应性。
16名患有特应性皮炎(AD)的儿童,年龄在12个月至8岁(平均年龄2.61±1.93岁),皮肤点刺试验(SPT)对牛肉呈阳性;他们所有人对羊肉和牛奶的SPT也呈阳性。经过一段时间的限制饮食后,召回了选定的16名儿童;对12名无AD的儿童(8名男性和4名女性,年龄在12个月至4.33岁(平均年龄2.21±1.05岁))进行了SPT和放射变应原吸附试验(RAST),检测以下过敏原:牛肉、羊肉、1mg/ml的BSA、1mg/ml的OSA。对牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和羊血清白蛋白(OSA)进行了双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)。对于SPT,结果以风团的毫米数表示,3毫米被视为终点;风团直径之间的相关性通过Spearman等级检验计算。对于DBPCFC,根据Sampson的实验程序,将BSA和OSA加入梨汁中(在开始口服激发试验前,通过新鲜食物SPT验证对梨汁的皮肤阴性反应)。给儿童施用的总剂量相当于180克小牛或羊肉中存在的白蛋白量(分别为90毫克和63毫克,通过十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SPS-PAGE)计算)。梨汁(含安慰剂或白蛋白)的施用和症状评估委托给不知道儿童接受了什么的医务人员。
所有接受测试的儿童对牛肉和羊肉以及BSA和OSA的SPT均呈阳性。在以下风团直径之间观察到显著相关性:BSA与OSA(R = 0.846,p < 0.0001);羊肉与OSA(R = 0.769,p < 0.005);牛肉与羊肉(R = 0.771,p < 0.005);以及羊肉与BSA(R = 0.594,p < 0.043)。在RAST中,12名儿童中有6名对牛肉呈阳性,3名对羊肉呈阳性,4名对BSA呈阳性,3名对OSA呈阳性。DBPCFC显示,分别有2名和3名儿童对BSA或OSA出现即刻反应。另一名儿童在接受OSA激发试验3小时后出现严重呼吸困难、咳嗽和哮喘。
BSA和OSA是重要的牛肉和羊肉过敏原;它们不仅共享蛋白质序列,还具有过敏特性。对BSA和OSA的临床耐受性可能存在于牛肉和羊肉SPT阳性的儿童中。