Zhou J, Bruns M A, Tiedje J M
Center for Microbial Ecologia, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824-1325, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):316-22. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.2.316-322.1996.
A simple, rapid method for bacterial lysis and direct extraction of DNA from soils with minimal shearing was developed to address the risk of chimera formation from small template DNA during subsequent PCR. The method was based on lysis with a high-salt extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl) and extended heating (2 to 3 h) of the soil suspension in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and proteinase K. The extraction method required 6 h and was tested on eight soils differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH, including ones from which DNA extraction is difficult. The DNA fragment size in crude extracts from all soils was > 23 kb. Preliminary trials indicated that DNA recovery from two soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria was 92 to 99%. When the method was tested on all eight unseeded soils, microscopic examination of indigenous bacteria in soil pellets before and after extraction showed variable cell lysis efficiency (26 to 92%). Crude DNA yields from the eight soils ranged from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1, and these were positively correlated with the organic carbon content in the soil (r = 0.73). DNA yields from gram-positive bacteria from pure cultures were two to six times higher when the high-salt-SDS-heat method was combined with mortar-and-pestle grinding and freeze-thawing, and most DNA recovered was of high molecular weight. Four methods for purifying crude DNA were also evaluated for percent recovery, fragment size, speed, enzyme restriction, PCR amplification, and DNA-DNA hybridization. In general, all methods produced DNA pure enough for PCR amplification. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics will influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods on the basis of experimental goals.
为解决后续PCR过程中小模板DNA形成嵌合体的风险,开发了一种简单、快速的细菌裂解和从土壤中直接提取DNA的方法,该方法能将DNA剪切降至最低。该方法基于用高盐提取缓冲液(1.5 M NaCl)进行裂解,并在十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)、十六烷基三甲基溴化铵和蛋白酶K存在的情况下,对土壤悬浮液进行长时间加热(2至3小时)。该提取方法耗时6小时,并在8种有机碳、粘土含量和pH值不同的土壤上进行了测试,包括难以提取DNA的土壤。所有土壤粗提物中的DNA片段大小均大于23 kb。初步试验表明,从接种革兰氏阴性菌的两种土壤中回收的DNA为92%至99%。当该方法在所有8种未接种的土壤上进行测试时,提取前后对土壤颗粒中土著细菌的显微镜检查显示细胞裂解效率各不相同(26%至92%)。8种土壤的粗DNA产量范围为2.5至26.9微克DNA g-¹,且与土壤中的有机碳含量呈正相关(r = 0.73)。当高盐-SDS-加热法与研钵研磨和冻融相结合时,纯培养物中革兰氏阳性菌的DNA产量提高了2至6倍,回收的大部分DNA为高分子量。还对四种纯化粗DNA的方法进行了回收率、片段大小、速度、酶切、PCR扩增和DNA-DNA杂交等方面的评估。一般来说,所有方法产生的DNA纯度都足以进行PCR扩增。由于土壤类型和微生物群落特征会影响DNA回收,本研究为根据实验目标选择合适的提取和纯化方法提供了指导。