Paris J, Zweig-Frank H, Bond M, Guzder J
Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996 Mar;184(3):153-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199603000-00003.
The purpose of this study was to compare ratings of defense styles and hostility in male patients with personality disorders, to determine whether either of these is related to a borderline diagnosis, or to specific psychological risk factors. Subjects with personality disorders were divided into borderline personality disorder (BPD) (N = 61) and non-BPD (N = 60) groups were given both the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) and the Buss-Durkee Guilt-Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Risk factors were measured by a developmental interview and the the Parental Bonding Index. The BPD group reported more maladaptive and image distorting defenses on the DSQ, as well as higher ratings on the BDHI. Ratings on both dependent measures were strongly related to diagnosis, and more weakly to measures of psychological risk factors. Thus, in men with personality disorders, immature defense styles and high levels of hostility are strongly associated with a borderline diagnosis.
本研究的目的是比较人格障碍男性患者的防御方式评分和敌意程度，以确定其中任何一项是否与边缘型人格障碍诊断相关，或与特定的心理风险因素相关。将人格障碍患者分为边缘型人格障碍（BPD）组（N = 61）和非BPD组（N = 60），两组均接受防御方式问卷（DSQ）和巴斯-杜克内疚-敌意量表（BDHI）测试。通过发展访谈和父母教养方式指数来测量风险因素。BPD组在DSQ上报告了更多适应不良和形象扭曲的防御方式，在BDHI上的评分也更高。两项相关测量的评分与诊断密切相关，与心理风险因素的测量相关性较弱。因此，在患有人格障碍的男性中，不成熟的防御方式和高水平的敌意与边缘型人格障碍诊断密切相关。
