Aitken D, Hay J, Kinnear F B, Kirkness C M, Lee W R, Seal D V
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Ophthalmology. 1996 Mar;103(3):485-94. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30667-2.
To support the hypothesis that Acanthamoeba is not a unique cause of amebic keratitis, we report a case of amebic keratitis in which viable Acanthamoeba could not be isolated from corneal tissue. Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella, two other genera of free-living ameba, were isolated, however, using prolonged culture.
A 24-year-old wearer of soft contact lenses had keratitis. Extensive histologic and microbiologic investigations were performed on corneal scrape, biopsy, and keratoplasty tissue. Contact lenses, storage case, and the home water supply, where contact lens hygiene was practiced, were examined for the presence of micro-organisms.
No viruses, pathogenic bacteria, or fungi were detected from corneal tissue samples. Amebae were observed using light and electron microscopy, but these could not be unequivocally classified using immunocytochemical staining. Viable Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella, but no Acanthamoeba, were isolated from the corneal biopsy sample. Indirect immunofluorescence with a range of polyclonal rabbit antisera raised against axenically cultivated stains of the three amebal genera was unhelpful because of cross-reactivity. A diverse range of micro-organisms was present within the storage case, including the three amebal species. Amebic cysts also were associated with the contact lens.
A mixed non-Acanthamoeba amebic keratitis has been identified in a wearer of soft contact lenses where lack of storage case hygiene provided the opportunity for the free-living protozoa Vahlkampfia and Hartmannella to be introduced to the ocular surface. When Acanthamoeba-like keratitis occurs, but where Acanthamoeba cannot be isolated using conventional laboratory culture methods, alternate means should be used to identify other amebae that may be present. Polyclonal immunofluorescent antibody staining was unreliable for generic identification of pathogenic free-living amebae in corneal tissue.
为支持棘阿米巴不是阿米巴性角膜炎唯一病因这一假说,我们报告一例阿米巴性角膜炎病例,该病例角膜组织中未分离出活的棘阿米巴。然而,通过延长培养,分离出了另外两种自由生活阿米巴属——瓦氏阿米巴属和哈特曼氏阿米巴属。
一名24岁的软性隐形眼镜佩戴者患角膜炎。对角膜刮片、活检组织和角膜移植组织进行了广泛的组织学和微生物学检查。对隐形眼镜、储存盒以及进行隐形眼镜护理的家庭供水进行了微生物检测。
角膜组织样本中未检测到病毒、病原菌或真菌。通过光学显微镜和电子显微镜观察到了阿米巴,但使用免疫细胞化学染色无法明确分类。从角膜活检样本中分离出了活的瓦氏阿米巴属和哈特曼氏阿米巴属,但未分离出棘阿米巴。由于存在交叉反应,使用针对三种阿米巴属无菌培养菌株产生的一系列多克隆兔抗血清进行间接免疫荧光检测没有帮助。储存盒内存在多种微生物,包括这三种阿米巴属。隐形眼镜上也发现了阿米巴囊肿。
在一名软性隐形眼镜佩戴者中发现了混合性非棘阿米巴性阿米巴角膜炎,由于缺乏储存盒卫生护理,使得自由生活的原生动物瓦氏阿米巴属和哈特曼氏阿米巴属有机会进入眼表。当发生类似棘阿米巴性角膜炎但使用传统实验室培养方法无法分离出棘阿米巴时,应采用其他方法来鉴定可能存在的其他阿米巴。多克隆免疫荧光抗体染色在角膜组织中对致病性自由生活阿米巴进行属的鉴定时不可靠。