Suppr超能文献

被建议用作石棉替代品的粘土矿物的体外生物学效应。

In vitro biological effects of clay minerals advised as substitutes for asbestos.

作者信息

Governa M, Valentino M, Visonà I, Monaco F, Amati M, Scancarello G, Scansetti G

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine, University of Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Cell Biol Toxicol. 1995 Oct;11(5):237-49. doi: 10.1007/BF00757622.

Abstract

We studied one sample of commercial sepiolite and two samples of commercial vermiculite--clay minerals proposed as replacements for asbestos--and tested in vitro their abilities to activate complement, to lyse erythrocytes, and to elicit the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) with human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) or bovine alveolar macrophages (AM); their behavior was compared with that of asbestos fibers obtained from the Union International Contra Cancer (UICC) as reference standards, as well as with kaolinite and illite, main members of the clay mineral family. Since in short-term in vitro tests the biological activity of mineral particles seems especially related to the active sites on their surface, we first measured the specific surface area of each mineral. Sepiolite was unreactive in two of the three tests we used (complement activation and ROS production) and able to lyse a minimal percentage of red blood cells. Vermiculite was shown to be incapable of activating complement, to have a moderate hemolytic activity and a high ability to elicite ROS production, although lower than that of chrysotile. Sepiolite, therefore, might be of more interest than vermiculite, given the low level of biological effects detected during the tests used to compare both clay minerals with asbestos fibres. The ROS production does not seem to require phagocytosis. A high ROS production was observed with kaolinite: this result casts doubt on the ability of pathogenic mineral dusts in vitro to induce a greater release of ROS than nonpathogenic mineral dusts.

摘要

我们研究了一种商用海泡石样品和两种商用蛭石样品(这两种粘土矿物被提议作为石棉的替代品),并在体外测试了它们激活补体、裂解红细胞以及在人多形核白细胞(PMN)或牛肺泡巨噬细胞(AM)存在的情况下引发活性氧(ROS)产生的能力;将它们的行为与作为参考标准从国际抗癌联盟(UICC)获得的石棉纤维以及粘土矿物家族的主要成员高岭石和伊利石进行了比较。由于在短期体外试验中,矿物颗粒的生物活性似乎特别与它们表面的活性位点有关,我们首先测量了每种矿物的比表面积。海泡石在我们使用的三项测试中的两项(补体激活和ROS产生)中无反应,并且只能裂解最低百分比的红细胞。蛭石被证明无法激活补体,具有中等溶血活性和较高的引发ROS产生的能力,尽管低于温石棉。因此,鉴于在将两种粘土矿物与石棉纤维进行比较的测试中检测到的低生物效应水平,海泡石可能比蛭石更具研究价值。ROS的产生似乎不需要吞噬作用。高岭石显示出高ROS产生:这一结果使人怀疑致病性矿物粉尘在体外诱导ROS释放比非致病性矿物粉尘更多的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验