• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A double-blind, three-week study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg and meloxicam 15 mg in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

作者信息

Reginster J Y, Distel M, Bluhmki E

机构信息

Bone and Cartilage Metabolism Research Unit, University of Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:17-21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.17.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.17
PMID:8630631
Abstract

A multicentre, double-blind, randomized study was conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in order to compare the efficacy and safety of two different doses of meloxicam, a new preferential cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor. Four hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral meloxicam 7.5 mg (n = 216) or meloxicam 15 mg (n = 207) for 3 weeks. The Ritchie joint index and pain in the morning were significantly improved versus baseline (P < 0.001) in both groups. There were no significant differences between the effects of each dose with respect to these measures nor with respect to final assessment of global efficacy by the patients. However, the 15 mg dose was associated with a significantly (P < 0.05) better effect on morning stiffness and grip strength. No differences between the doses were observed with regard to the other secondary efficacy parameter (pain at night, body weight and erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Both doses of meloxicam were well tolerated. There were no differences between the doses with respect to global tolerance as assessed by the patient and the patients, 'general condition'. In conclusion, meloxicam at a once-daily dose of either 7.5 or 15 mg is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of patients with RA.

摘要

相似文献

1
A double-blind, three-week study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg and meloxicam 15 mg in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:17-21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.17.
2
A long-term study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of meloxicam therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.一项评估美洛昔康治疗类风湿关节炎患者安全性和有效性的长期研究。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:29-34. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.29.
3
A six-month double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg daily and naproxen 750 mg daily in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.一项为期六个月的双盲试验,旨在比较每日服用7.5毫克美洛昔康和每日服用750毫克萘普生对类风湿性关节炎患者的疗效和安全性。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:22-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.22.
4
Dose response and safety study of meloxicam up to 22.5 mg daily in rheumatoid arthritis: a 12 week multicenter, double blind, dose response study versus placebo and diclofenac.美洛昔康每日剂量高达22.5毫克治疗类风湿性关节炎的剂量反应及安全性研究:一项为期12周的多中心、双盲、与安慰剂和双氯芬酸对比的剂量反应研究。
J Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;29(3):436-46.
5
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and tolerance of meloxicam treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.一项关于美洛昔康治疗膝骨关节炎有效性和耐受性的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27(1):32-7. doi: 10.1080/030097498441146.
6
Comparison of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in rheumatoid arthritis patients.类风湿关节炎患者中肌肉注射与口服美洛昔康的比较。
Inflamm Res. 2001 Mar;50 Suppl 1:S10-6. doi: 10.1007/PL00022374.
7
A double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 15 mg with piroxicam 20 mg in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:35-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.35.
8
Efficacy and safety of meloxicam in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.美洛昔康治疗类风湿关节炎患者的疗效与安全性。
J Rheumatol. 1997 Feb;24(2):282-90.
9
Tolerability of multiple administration of intramuscular meloxicam: a comparison with intramuscular piroxicam in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.肌肉注射美洛昔康多次给药的耐受性:与类风湿性关节炎或骨关节炎患者肌肉注射吡罗昔康的比较。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:51-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.51.
10
Meloxicam in osteoarthritis: a 6-month, double-blind comparison with diclofenac sodium.美洛昔康治疗骨关节炎:与双氯芬酸钠进行的为期6个月的双盲对照研究。
Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Apr;35 Suppl 1:39-43. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.suppl_1.39.

引用本文的文献

1
New Gel Approaches for the Transdermal Delivery of Meloxicam.用于美洛昔康经皮给药的新型凝胶制剂
Gels. 2025 Jun 26;11(7):500. doi: 10.3390/gels11070500.
2
Meloxicam in the management of post-operative pain: Narrative review.美洛昔康用于术后疼痛管理:叙述性综述。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):450-457. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_133_18.
3
Biotransformation of Meloxicam by Cunninghamella blakesleeana: Significance of Carbon and Nitrogen Source.《黑曲霉对美洛昔康的生物转化:碳源和氮源的意义》
Indian J Microbiol. 2011 Jan;51(1):82-7. doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0099-0. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
4
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of meloxicam in rheumatoid arthritis patients.美洛昔康在类风湿性关节炎患者中的群体药代动力学分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jan;55(1):32-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01753.x.