Bissonette R
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1977 Spring;23(1):31-4. doi: 10.1177/002076407702300106.
Two of the major themes in the community psychiatry movement have been the employment of new and different types of persons in service roles and the maintenance of clients in the community, whenever possible, with avoidance of institutionalisation. A logical outcome of the combination of these two themes has been an increasing interest in the role of persons with fixed social roles within the community as gatekeepers for actual direct service or appropriate referrals into the mental health service system. Police, clergy and bartenders are among the social roles that have received serious consideration and, in some cases, actual use as points of entry and actual service. Careful analysis of the likely requirements of the gatekeeper role will show, however, that many existing social roles that appear fertile ground for the mental health gatekeeper function are in fact lacking in certain features necessary to such a role. This paper presents five criteria considered important or essential to any conclusion that a given role should be seriously considered for the gatekeeper function. These criteria may serve for a shortcut prior to the investment of money and time and may thus have false and expensive steps in our enthusiastic but often hasty search for innovation.
社区精神病学运动的两大主要主题是让新型和不同类型的人员担任服务角色,以及尽可能让患者留在社区,避免将其机构化。这两个主题相结合的一个合理结果是,人们越来越关注社区中具有固定社会角色的人员作为实际直接服务的守门人或进入心理健康服务系统的适当转诊渠道的作用。警察、神职人员和酒保等社会角色已得到认真考虑,在某些情况下,还被实际用作进入点和实际服务提供者。然而,对守门人角色可能要求的仔细分析将表明,许多现有的社会角色看似是心理健康守门人功能的沃土,但实际上缺乏该角色所需的某些特征。本文提出了五条标准,这些标准对于任何关于某个特定角色应被认真考虑承担守门人功能的结论而言都被认为是重要或必不可少的。这些标准可在投入金钱和时间之前提供一条捷径,从而在我们热情但往往仓促地寻求创新的过程中避免错误且昂贵的步骤。