• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗森伯格自尊量表竞争因素结构的纵向测试:特质、短暂人工制品和稳定的反应风格。

Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.

机构信息

Department of Education, University of Oxford, 15 Norham Gardens, Oxford, OX2 6PY, England.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):366-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019225.

DOI:10.1037/a0019225
PMID:20528064
Abstract

Self-esteem, typically measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE), is one of the most widely studied constructs in psychology. Nevertheless, there is broad agreement that a simple unidimensional factor model, consistent with the original design and typical application in applied research, does not provide an adequate explanation of RSE responses. However, there is no clear agreement about what alternative model is most appropriate-or even a clear rationale for how to test competing interpretations. Three alternative interpretations exist: (a) 2 substantively important trait factors (positive and negative self-esteem), (b) 1 trait factor and ephemeral method artifacts associated with positively or negatively worded items, or (c) 1 trait factor and stable response-style method factors associated with item wording. We have posited 8 alternative models and structural equation model tests based on longitudinal data (4 waves of data across 8 years with a large, representative sample of adolescents). Longitudinal models provide no support for the unidimensional model, undermine support for the 2-factor model, and clearly refute claims that wording effects are ephemeral, but they provide good support for models positing 1 substantive (self-esteem) factor and response-style method factors that are stable over time. This longitudinal methodological approach has not only resolved these long-standing issues in self-esteem research but also has broad applicability to most psychological assessments based on self-reports with a mix of positively and negatively worded items.

摘要

自尊通常通过罗森伯格自尊量表(RSE)来衡量,是心理学中研究最广泛的结构之一。尽管如此,人们普遍认为,简单的单维因素模型,与原始设计和应用研究中的典型应用一致,不能充分解释 RSE 的反应。然而,对于哪种替代模型最合适,甚至对于如何检验竞争解释的合理依据,都没有明确的共识。存在三种替代解释:(a)两个实质性重要的特质因素(积极和消极的自尊),(b)一个特质因素和与积极或消极措辞项目相关的短暂方法伪影,或(c)一个特质因素和与项目措辞相关的稳定反应风格方法因素。我们提出了 8 种替代模型和基于纵向数据的结构方程模型检验(跨越 8 年的 4 个数据波,样本量较大且具有代表性的青少年)。纵向模型不支持单维模型,破坏了对 2 因素模型的支持,并明确驳斥了措辞效应是短暂的说法,但它们为假设 1 个实质性(自尊)因素和随时间稳定的反应风格方法因素的模型提供了很好的支持。这种纵向方法不仅解决了自尊研究中的这些长期问题,而且对大多数基于自我报告的心理评估也具有广泛的适用性,这些评估中包含了积极和消极措辞的项目。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.罗森伯格自尊量表竞争因素结构的纵向测试:特质、短暂人工制品和稳定的反应风格。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):366-81. doi: 10.1037/a0019225.
2
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.
3
Components of self-esteem in affective patients and non-psychiatric controls.情感障碍患者与非精神科对照人群自尊的组成部分。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Sep;88(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.05.008.
4
Method Effects on an Adaptation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Greek and the Role of Personality Traits.方法对希腊语版罗森伯格自尊量表改编的影响及人格特质的作用。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(2):178-88. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089248. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the Three-and the Five-factor personality models.罗森伯格自尊量表的维度及其与三因素和五因素人格模型的关系。
J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):246-9. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268116.
6
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
7
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: a bifactor answer to a two-factor question?罗森伯格自尊量表:对双因素问题的双因素答案?
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(6):654-60. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.923436. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
[Rosenberg self-esteem scale: validation in a representative sample of Chilean adults].[罗森伯格自尊量表:在智利成年人代表性样本中的效度验证]
Rev Med Chil. 2009 Jun;137(6):791-800. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
9
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem.在53个国家同时开展罗森伯格自尊量表调查:探索全球自尊的普遍特征和文化特异性特征。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):623-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623.
10
Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?积极和消极的总体自尊:是实质性的有意义区分还是人为产物?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):810-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.810.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Weekly Levels of Supervisor Support and Workload on Next Week Levels of Well-Being, Satisfaction, and Performance as Mediated by Weekend Work Recovery.每周主管支持和工作量水平通过周末工作恢复对下周幸福感、满意度和绩效水平的影响。
Stress Health. 2025 Apr;41(2):e3520. doi: 10.1002/smi.3520. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Factorial and Criterion Validities of the Chinese Version of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Among Undergraduate Students.罗森伯格自尊量表中文版在本科生中的效标效度和因素效度
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Dec 5;17:4135-4144. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S494452. eCollection 2024.
3
Confidence in mathematics is confounded by responses to reverse-coded items.
对数学的信心因对反向计分项目的回答而受到混淆。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1489054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1489054. eCollection 2024.
4
How does item wording affect participants' responses in Likert scale? Evidence from IRT analysis.李克特量表中项目措辞如何影响参与者的回答?来自项目反应理论分析的证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 4;15:1304870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1304870. eCollection 2024.
5
The Experience of Embodiment Scale: An examination of its psychometric properties in women from the Republic of Cyprus.体现体验量表:塞浦路斯共和国女性的心理测量特性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303268. eCollection 2024.
6
Structural validity of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in patients with schizophrenia in Indonesia.印度尼西亚精神分裂症患者罗森伯格自尊量表的结构效度。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0300184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300184. eCollection 2024.
7
A Multilevel Person-Centered Perspective on the Role of Job Demands and Resources for Employees' Job Engagement and Burnout Profiles.从多层次以人为本的视角看工作要求与资源对员工工作投入和倦怠状况的作用
Group Organ Manag. 2024 Jun;49(3):621-672. doi: 10.1177/10596011221100893. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
Dimensionality of the Swahili version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in a Kenyan population: A confirmatory factor analysis.斯瓦希里语版一般健康问卷(GHQ - 12)在肯尼亚人群中的维度:一项验证性因素分析。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Apr 11;11:e48. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.46. eCollection 2024.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Trust in Science and Scientists Scale.《科学与科学家信任量表》的心理测量学评估
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 17;11(4):231228. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231228. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Development of a revised version of the transdiagnostic skills scale (T2S-R).跨诊断技能量表修订版(T2S-R)的开发。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 12;15:1290692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290692. eCollection 2024.