Suppr超能文献

采用Ventana ES 320自动免疫组织化学染色仪及CAS 200图像分析仪检测236例早期乳腺癌的雌激素和孕激素受体状态:预后意义

Estrogen and progesterone receptor status determined by the Ventana ES 320 automated immunohistochemical stainer and the CAS 200 image analyzer in 236 early-stage breast carcinomas: prognostic significance.

作者信息

Layfield L J, Saria E A, Conlon D H, Kerns B J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 1996 Mar;61(3):177-84. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199603)61:3<177::AID-JSO3>3.0.CO;2-8.

Abstract

The quantitation of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PgR) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of patients with primary breast carcinoma. It has been demonstrated that ER and PgR detected by immunohistochemical methods in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue can be quantified by computerized image analysis. In this study, ER and PgR levels were determined by using an automated immunochemistry stainer (Ventana ES 320) and an image analyzer (CAS 200) in a series of 236 patients with stage I/II carcinoma of the breast. The degree of correlation of the ER and PgR levels determined by the dextran-coated charcoal method (DCC) with image analysis quantitation was high (r=0.75). The agreement between both methods was 77% for ER and 73% for PgR. Hormone receptor levels were correlated with prognosis as determined by overall survival. An ER level of 30 fmol/mg as determined by image analysis was established to stratify the patient population most effectively into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups (P=0.003). An ER level of 20 fmol/mg for prognostic stratification reached statistical significance (P=0.03). The DCC method was not able to stratify the patients into prognostic groups at the traditionally accepted cutpoint of 10 fmol/mg (P=0.52). We conclude that when used in combination, automated immunohistochemistry and quantitative image analysis offer a favorable alternative to the DCC method in assessment of ER and PgR status in human mammary carcinoma. In addition, quantitative immunocytochemistry techniques may prove superior to the DCC method in specimens in which there is limited tumor volume (including fine-needle aspirates), stroma-rich tumors, and early-stage lesions including intraductal carcinoma.

摘要

雌激素和孕激素受体(ER和PgR)的定量分析已成为原发性乳腺癌患者评估的标准治疗方法。已证实,通过免疫组织化学方法在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织中检测到的ER和PgR可通过计算机图像分析进行定量。在本研究中,使用自动免疫化学染色仪(Ventana ES 320)和图像分析仪(CAS 200)对236例I/II期乳腺癌患者进行了ER和PgR水平测定。用葡聚糖包被活性炭法(DCC)测定的ER和PgR水平与图像分析定量的相关性较高(r=0.75)。两种方法之间的一致性对于ER为77%,对于PgR为73%。激素受体水平与总生存确定的预后相关。通过图像分析确定的ER水平为30 fmol/mg时,能最有效地将患者群体分为预后良好和不良组(P=0.003)。用于预后分层的ER水平为20 fmol/mg时具有统计学意义(P=0.03)。DCC方法在传统接受的切点10 fmol/mg时无法将患者分为预后组(P=0.52)。我们得出结论,联合使用自动免疫组织化学和定量图像分析在评估人乳腺癌的ER和PgR状态方面为DCC方法提供了一个更好的替代方法。此外,在肿瘤体积有限的标本(包括细针穿刺抽吸物)、富含基质的肿瘤以及包括导管内癌在内的早期病变中,定量免疫细胞化学技术可能优于DCC方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验