Cranshaw J, Hughes G, Clancy M
Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Bristol Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;13(2):80-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.2.80.
The aim was to reconsider the "Guidelines for initial management of head injury in adults"--particularly with respect to the indications for computerised tomographic (CT) scanning--suggested by "a group of neurosurgeons" over a decade ago and still followed in some accident and emergency (A&E) departments. These recommendations are placed in the context of more recent research and the increased number of A&E departments with on-site rapid access to a CT scanner but without a resident neurosurgical facility. A case can be made for an updated policy with more liberal indications for CT scanning of acutely head injured adults in peripheral A&E departments. However, calculating the cost-efficiency of more frequent use of what is now a common but relatively expensive resource would remain a challenge.
目的是重新审视“一组神经外科医生”在十多年前提出的、至今仍在一些急诊(A&E)科室遵循的“成人头部损伤初始管理指南”,尤其是关于计算机断层扫描(CT)的指征。这些建议是在最近的研究以及越来越多的急诊科室可在现场快速使用CT扫描仪但没有常驻神经外科设施的背景下提出的。对于在外围急诊科室对急性头部受伤的成年人进行CT扫描采用更宽松的指征制定更新政策是有道理的。然而,计算更频繁使用现在这种常见但相对昂贵的资源的成本效益仍将是一项挑战。